LONDON (Reuters) - A British vote to leave the European Union next week would make UK energy infrastructure investment costlier and delay new projects at a time when the country needs to plug a looming electricity supply gap.
Energy has been far from central to debates about whether to leave the EU - a move dubbed "Brexit" - but the sector would still be impacted by a decision in the June 23 referendum to quit the 28-nation bloc.
After a Brexit vote, all EU laws apply in Britain until two years after London starts the process to leave. Then none would apply but Britain could try to stay part of some frameworks through negotiations, a process that could take years.
Uncertainty about the type of relationship Britain would have with the EU after Brexit would make energy investors demand higher returns for the risk of less favourable conditions.
Oil and gas majors BP and Shell are among several energy companies that say leaving the EU would affect them and the sector negatively.
"I can't see any upside for the energy sector of the UK coming out of the EU. The risk premium going up will increase the cost of capital," Ian Simm, chief executive of UK-based Impax Asset Management, said.
"We have mostly run our power assets down over the past 25 years. Therefore, we do need investors to be confident enough to put their hands in their pockets and commit to the next wave of power plants," he added.
UK-based consultancy Vivid Economics has estimated the cost of exclusion from the internal energy market, excluding impacts on investment, could be up to 500 million pounds ($708 million) a year by the early 2020s.
"The scale of planned infrastructure investment in the electricity sector over the next decade means that even small increases in the cost of financing could have large consequences for total investment costs," it said in a report.
"Further upwards pressure on costs would result from the likely devaluation of the pound, given the role imported goods and services play in UK energy supply."
According to a Reuters poll this month, the British pound would sink 9 percent against the dollar after Brexit. [GBP/POLL]
Britain faces serious energy supply difficulties over the next few years as coal plants have to close by 2025, the nuclear fleet is aging and weak economic conditions curb investment in new gas-fired power plants.
Renewable energy is growing, but more interconnections and energy storage are needed. The British government has estimated that the required energy infrastructure will cost 275 billion pounds by 2020-2021.
French utility EDF's plan to build two huge nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point in Britain would help plug the supply gap. The company's chief executive said earlier this year that Brexit would not change its plans, but it has not yet made a final investment decision.
"The 3.2-gigawatt Hinkley nuclear project looks to be a financing headache in any scenario, given the parlous state of EDF's share price and balance sheet," Michael Liebreich, chairman of the advisory board of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said in a blog post.
Investment in inter connectors is also important for Britain. UK wholesale power prices are higher than the EU average, partly because interconnections with other countries are able only to supply around 6 percent of peak electricity demand.
However, efforts to link the UK's electricity grid with other European power networks could be set back due to Brexit, with some projects likely to be put on hold because Britain would no longer automatically have a say in the formulation of EU energy regulations, Norton Rose Fulbright lawyers said.
Investment in renewables could be hampered. Changes by the government over the past couple of years to renewable-energy subsidies have already dented investment in clean energy.
"There is investor uncertainty already but the only thing that gives it any kind of framing is through the UK's obligations to the EU. If I was a cleantech investor I would be concerned," said Anthony Hobley, chief executive of think-tank Carbon Tracker Initiative.
Britain could also lose access to funding for renewables, particularly offshore wind, from EU institutions such as the European Investment Bank, said Charlie Thomas, manager of Jupiter Asset Management's Ecology Fund. Such assistance last year totalled around 7 billion euros.
"But at the same time, our view is that there is significant appetite from private-sector institutional investors to step in to any funding gap," he added.
($1 = 0.7060 pounds)
By Nina Chestney
(Editing by Dale Hudson)
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
Pioneering technology expert tells ADIPEC Energy Dialogue up to 80 per cent of plant shutdowns could be mitigated through combination of advanced electrification, automation and digitalisation technologies
Greater use of renewables in power management processes offers oil and gas companies opportunities to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects
Abu Dhabi, UAE – XX August 2020 – Leveraging the synergies created by the convergence of electrification, automation and digitalisation, can create significant cost savings for oil and gas companies when making both operational and capital investment decisions, according to Dr Peter Terwiesch, President of Industrial Automation at ABB, a Swiss-Swedish multinational company, operating mainly in robotics, power, heavy electrical equipment, and automation technology areas.
Participating in the latest ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, Dr Terwiesch said up to 80 per cent of energy industry plant shutdowns, caused by human error, or rotating machinery or power outages, could be mitigated through a combination of electrification, automation and digitalisation.
“Savings are clearly possible not only on the operation side but also, using the same synergies between dimensions, you can bring down the cost schedule and risk of capital investment, especially in a time when making projects work economically is harder,” explained Dr Terwiesch.
A pioneering technology leader, who works closely with utility, industry, transportation and infrastructure customers, Dr Terwiesch said despite the increasing investment by oil and gas companies in renewables and the growing use of renewables to generate electricity, both for individual and industrial uses, hydrocarbons will continue to have an important role in creating energy, in the short to medium term.
“If you look at the energy density constraints, clearly electricity is gaining share but electricity is not the source of energy; it is a conduit of energy. The energy has to come from somewhere and that can be hydrocarbons, or nuclear, or renewables.” he said.
Nevertheless, he added, the greater use of renewables to generate electricity offers oil and gas companies the option of integrating a higher share of renewables into power management processes to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects.
The ADIPEC Energy Dialogue is a series of online thought leadership events created by dmg events, organisers of the annual Abu Dhabi International Exhibition and Conference. Featuring key stakeholders and decision-makers in the oil and gas industry, the dialogues focus on how the industry is evolving and transforming in response to the rapidly changing energy market.
With this year’s in person ADIPEC exhibition and conference postponed to November 2021, the ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, along with insightful webinars, podcasts and on line panels continue to connect the oil and gas industry, with the challenges and opportunities shaping energy markets in the run up to, and following, a planned three-day live stream virtual ADIPEC conference taking place from November 9-11.
An industry first of its kind, the online conference will bring together energy leaders, ministers and global oil and gas CEOs to assess the collective measures the industry needs to put in place to fast-track recovery, post COVID-19.
To watch the full ADIPEC Energy Dialogue series go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZzUd32n3_s&t=6s
Utility-scale battery storage systems are increasingly being installed in the United States. In 2010, the United States had seven operational battery storage systems, which accounted for 59 megawatts (MW) of power capacity (the maximum amount of power output a battery can provide in any instant) and 21 megawatthours (MWh) of energy capacity (the total amount of energy that can be stored or discharged by a battery). By the end of 2018, the United States had 125 operational battery storage systems, providing a total of 869 MW of installed power capacity and 1,236 MWh of energy capacity.
Battery storage systems store electricity produced by generators or pulled directly from the electrical grid, and they redistribute the power later as needed. These systems have a wide variety of applications, including integrating renewables into the grid, peak shaving, frequency regulation, and providing backup power.
Most utility-scale battery storage capacity is installed in regions covered by independent system operators (ISOs) or regional transmission organizations (RTOs). Historically, most battery systems are in the PJM Interconnection (PJM), which manages the power grid in 13 eastern and Midwestern states as well as the District of Columbia, and in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). Together, PJM and CAISO accounted for 55% of the total battery storage power capacity built between 2010 and 2018. However, in 2018, more than 58% (130 MW) of new storage power capacity additions, representing 69% (337 MWh) of energy capacity additions, were installed in states outside of those areas.
In 2018, many regions outside of CAISO and PJM began adding greater amounts of battery storage capacity to their power grids, including Alaska and Hawaii, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO). Many of the additions were the result of procurement requirements, financial incentives, and long-term planning mechanisms that promote the use of energy storage in the respective states. Alaska and Hawaii, which have isolated power grids, are expanding battery storage capacity to increase grid reliability and reduce dependence on expensive fossil fuel imports.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report
Note: The cost range represents cost data elements from the 25th to 75th percentiles for each year of reported cost data.
Average costs per unit of energy capacity decreased 61% between 2015 and 2017, dropping from $2,153 per kilowatthour (kWh) to $834 per kWh. The large decrease in cost makes battery storage more economical, helping accelerate capacity growth. Affordable battery storage also plays an important role in the continued integration of storage with intermittent renewable electricity sources such as wind and solar.
Additional information on these topics is available in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) recently updated Battery Storage in the United States: An Update on Market Trends. This report explores trends in battery storage capacity additions and describes the current state of the market, including information on applications, cost, market and policy drivers, and future project developments.