NrgEdge Staff

Editorial Support
Last Updated: February 8, 2017
1 view
Business Trends
image

Last week in world oil:

Prices

- Oil prices started the week on a stronger note, as new tensions between the US and Iran raised fears that crude supplies could be affected. The spat has escalated recently with the US re-imposing sanctions in response to Iranian ballistic missile tests. This will colour crude prices over the rest of the quarter, with Brent currently at US$56/b and WTI at US$54/b.

Upstream & Midstream

- Defying protest attempts, Energy Transfer Partners Dakota Access crude oil pipeline linking Bakken shale oil to terminals in Illinois will begin pumping crude as early as June 2017, barring any new legal obstacles. None are anticipated, with President Trump already signalling his support, moving the US$3.8 billion pipeline ahead after it was stalled last September by the Obama administration for environmental review.

- The US oil and gas rig count has exceeded 700 for the first time since December 2015, as strength in oil prices prompted 17 new oil rigs to start up, bringing the total to 729. All but one of the rigs were onshore, with shale plays in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico comprising the bulk of the additions.

Downstream

- Perhaps a little too late, Algeria is attempting to ape its OPEC allies in the Middle East by expanding into petrochemicals. It has launched tenders to build four large petrochemical plants linked to state firm Sonatrachs four existing refineries in Tiaret, Hassi Messaoud and Skikda. The investment plans, valued at up to US$6 billion, includes a fuel oil cracking plant and a naphtha processing plant, with a planned petrochemical capacity exceeding 10 million tons per year.

Natural Gas and LNG

- Despite wariness over Russias ambitions, the town of Karlshamn in southern Sweden has agreed to let Russias Gazprom use its port for the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. The decision is supported by the Swedish government after the island of Gotland rejected hosting the pipeline last year, despite lingering national security concerns. The Nord Stream 2 pipeline is Russias latest way of feeding Western Europes appetite for natural gas, running from Russia through the Baltic Sea. Some resistance has been mounted over Russian dependence, and Ukraine has also objected over the possible loss of transit revenues from existing pipelines that run through the country.

- Germanys Uniper is selling its stake in the OLT offshore LNG Toscana terminal in Italy, divesting its 48.24% share in a deal that could value the entire business at 1 billion. The other stakeholders in OLT are Italian utility group Iren (49.07%) and US shipping group Golar LNG (2.69%).

Corporate

- After disappointing results from Chevron and ExxonMobil, Anglo-Dutch supermajor Shell reported its results for 2016, with full year profits down by 37% to US$7.185 billion, but 2H16 profits exceeded ExxonMobils, a rare occurrence. Its debt-to-equity ratio fell from 29.2% to 28%, as it makes progress in its post-BG Group acquisition debt reduction program, with assets sales of some US$3 billion in 4Q16.

Last week in Asian oil:

Upstream & Midstream

- One of the drawbacks of a free market is that it can undermine efforts to influence prices. OPECs supply cut has lifted prices over the past two months, but its power is muted as suppliers from the rest of the world rush to fill the gap left by OPEC members in Asia. Crude from the North Sea and the US Gulf Coast is making their way to Asia already, and some 2.19 million barrels of West African crude is scheduled for delivery to Asia in February, the highest level since August 2011. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has raised prices for March crude shipments across the board, including Asia, as it follows through on supply cuts to boost crude prices. It had previously refrained from raising prices to Asian buyers in January and February, limiting its price hikes to Europe and North America.

Downstream & Shipping

- After the departure of Saudi Aramco, Indonesias Pertamina has decided to proceed on its own to upgrade the Balongan refinery. The company, however, warned that the investment will be less than initially planned, with Pertamina lacking the financial muscle to juggle the project along with its wider goals of boosting upstream production. The Balongan upgrade was originally meant to double capacity to 240 kb/d, and expand the refinerys crude diet to include medium sour grades.

Natural Gas & LNG

- Iraq is aiming to up its capacity to process gas by-products from its oil sites in the southern fields, recovering natural gas liquids that would otherwise be flared. State player South Gas Co already runs one gas processing ventures in Basra with Basrah Gas Co (a joint venture between Shell and Mitsubishi), which began in 2013. That venture recovers some 700 cubic feet of gas per day, and competition rules requires that South Gas Co find new partners for the second gas processing venture, which would help reduce the current estimated flared amount of 600 million cubic feet per day. This would increase Iraqs exports of LPG and condensates, but current tensions with the US over President Trumps Muslim ban could see US players frozen out of the venture.

- Italys Eni has struck gas in Indonesia, moving a step closer to developing its Merakes discovery. Successful drills and tested at the Merakes-2 well indicate the excellent gas deliverability of the Merakes reservoir, discovered in October 2014 with estimated recoverable reservers of 2 Tcf of natural gas. Merakes is also just up the street from the another Eni-operated field, the Jangkrik field that began production in Q216, potentially maximising production synergies between the two fields through shared infrastructure. The Merakes field is in the prolific offshore Kutei Basin, led by Eni under the East Sepinggan Production Sharing Contract (PSC).

3
2 0

Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today

Latest NrgBuzz

The Impact of COVID 19 In The Downstream Oil & Gas Sector

Recent headlines on the oil industry have focused squarely on the upstream side: the amount of crude oil that is being produced and the resulting effect on oil prices, against a backdrop of the Covid-19 pandemic. But that is just one part of the supply chain. To be sold as final products, crude oil needs to be refined into its constituent fuels, each of which is facing its own crisis because of the overall demand destruction caused by the virus. And once the dust settles, the global refining industry will look very different.

Because even before the pandemic broke out, there was a surplus of refining capacity worldwide. According to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019, global oil demand was some 99.85 mmb/d. However, this consumption figure includes substitute fuels – ethanol blended into US gasoline and biodiesel in Europe and parts of Asia – as well as chemical additives added on to fuels. While by no means an exact science, extrapolating oil demand to exclude this results in a global oil demand figure of some 95.44 mmb/d. In comparison, global refining capacity was just over 100 mmb/d. This overcapacity is intentional; since most refineries do not run at 100% utilisation all the time and many will shut down for scheduled maintenance periodically, global refining utilisation rates stand at about 85%.

Based on this, even accounting for differences in definitions and calculations, global oil demand and global oil refining supply is relatively evenly matched. However, demand is a fluid beast, while refineries are static. With the Covid-19 pandemic entering into its sixth month, the impact on fuels demand has been dramatic. Estimates suggest that global oil demand fell by as much as 20 mmb/d at its peak. In the early days of the crisis, refiners responded by slashing the production of jet fuel towards gasoline and diesel, as international air travel was one of the first victims of the virus. As national and sub-national lockdowns were introduced, demand destruction extended to transport fuels (gasoline, diesel, fuel oil), petrochemicals (naphtha, LPG) and  power generation (gasoil, fuel oil). Just as shutting down an oil rig can take weeks to complete, shutting down an entire oil refinery can take a similar timeframe – while still producing fuels that there is no demand for.

Refineries responded by slashing utilisation rates, and prioritising certain fuel types. In China, state oil refiners moved from running their sites at 90% to 40-50% at the peak of the Chinese outbreak; similar moves were made by key refiners in South Korea and Japan. With the lockdowns easing across most of Asia, refining runs have now increased, stimulating demand for crude oil. In Europe, where the virus hit hard and fast, refinery utilisation rates dropped as low as 10% in some cases, with some countries (Portugal, Italy) halting refining activities altogether. In the USA, now the hardest-hit country in the world, several refineries have been shuttered, with no timeline on if and when production will resume. But with lockdowns easing, and the summer driving season up ahead, refinery production is gradually increasing.

But even if the end of the Covid-19 crisis is near, it still doesn’t change the fundamental issue facing the refining industry – there is still too much capacity. The supply/demand balance shows that most regions are quite even in terms of consumption and refining capacity, with the exception of overcapacity in Europe and the former Soviet Union bloc. The regional balances do hide some interesting stories; Chinese refining capacity exceeds its consumption by over 2 mmb/d, and with the addition of 3 new mega-refineries in 2019, that gap increases even further. The only reason why the balance in Asia looks relatively even is because of oil demand ‘sinks’ such as Indonesia, Vietnam and Pakistan. Even in the US, the wealth of refining capacity on the Gulf Coast makes smaller refineries on the East and West coasts increasingly redundant.

Given this, the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis will be the inevitable hastening of the current trend in the refining industry, the closure of small, simpler refineries in favour of large, complex and more modern refineries. On the chopping block will be many of the sub-50 kb/d refineries in Europe; because why run a loss-making refinery when the product can be imported for cheaper, even accounting for shipping costs from the Middle East or Asia? Smaller US refineries are at risk as well, along with legacy sites in the Middle East and Russia. Based on current trends, Europe alone could lose some 2 mmb/d of refining capacity by 2025. Rising oil prices and improvements in refining margins could ensure the continued survival of some vulnerable refineries, but that will only be a temporary measure. The trend is clear; out with the small, in with the big. Covid-19 will only amplify that. It may be a painful process, but in the grand scheme of things, it is also a necessary one.

Infographic: Global oil consumption and refining capacity (BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019)

Region
Consumption (mmb/d)*
Refining Capacity (mmb/d)
North America

22.71

22.33

Latin America

6.5

5.98

Europe

14.27

15.68

CIS

4.0

8.16

Middle East

9.0

9.7

Africa

3.96

3.4

Asia-Pacific

35

34.75

Total

95.44

100.05

*Extrapolated to exclude additives and substitute fuels (ethanol, biodiesel)

Market Outlook:

  • Crude price trading range: Brent – US$33-37/b, WTI – US$30-33/b
  • Crude oil prices hold their recent gains, staying rangebound with demand gradually improving as lockdown slowly ease
  • Worries that global oil supply would increase after June - when the OPEC+ supply deal eases and higher prices bring back some free-market production - kept prices in check
  • Russia has signalled that it intends to ease back immediately in line with the supply deal, but Saudi Arabia and its allies are pushing for the 9.7 mmb/d cut to be extended to end-2020, putting the two oil producers on another collision course that previously resulted in a price war
  • Morgan Stanley expects Brent prices to rise to US$40/b by 4Q 2020, but cautioned that a full recovery was only likely to materialise in 2021

End of Article

In this time of COVID-19, we have had to relook at the way we approach workplace learning. We understand that businesses can’t afford to push the pause button on capability building, as employee safety comes in first and mistakes can be very costly. That’s why we have put together a series of Virtual Instructor Led Training or VILT to ensure that there is no disruption to your workplace learning and progression.

Find courses available for Virtual Instructor Led Training through latest video conferencing technology.

May, 31 2020
North American crude oil prices are closely, but not perfectly, connected

selected North American crude oil prices

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on Bloomberg L.P. data
Note: All prices except West Texas Intermediate (Cushing) are spot prices.

The New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) front-month futures contract for West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the most heavily used crude oil price benchmark in North America, saw its largest and swiftest decline ever on April 20, 2020, dropping as low as -$40.32 per barrel (b) during intraday trading before closing at -$37.63/b. Prices have since recovered, and even though the market event proved short-lived, the incident is useful for highlighting the interconnectedness of the wider North American crude oil market.

Changes in the NYMEX WTI price can affect other price markers across North America because of physical market linkages such as pipelines—as with the WTI Midland price—or because a specific price is based on a formula—as with the Maya crude oil price. This interconnectedness led other North American crude oil spot price markers to also fall below zero on April 20, including WTI Midland, Mars, West Texas Sour (WTS), and Bakken Clearbrook. However, the usefulness of the NYMEX WTI to crude oil market participants as a reference price is limited by several factors.

pricing locations of selected North American crudes

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

First, NYMEX WTI is geographically specific because it is physically redeemed (or settled) at storage facilities located in Cushing, Oklahoma, and so it is influenced by events that may not reflect the wider market. The April 20 WTI price decline was driven in part by a local deficit of uncommitted crude oil storage capacity in Cushing. Similarly, while the price of the Bakken Guernsey marker declined to -$38.63/b, the price of Louisiana Light Sweet—a chemically comparable crude oil—decreased to $13.37/b.

Second, NYMEX WTI is chemically specific, meaning to be graded as WTI by NYMEX, a crude oil must fall within the acceptable ranges of 12 different physical characteristics such as density, sulfur content, acidity, and purity. NYMEX WTI can therefore be unsuitable as a price for crude oils with characteristics outside these specific ranges.

Finally, NYMEX WTI is time specific. As a futures contract, the price of a NYMEX WTI contract is the price to deliver 1,000 barrels of crude oil within a specific month in the future (typically at least 10 days). The last day of trading for the May 2020 contract, for instance, was April 21, with physical delivery occurring between May 1 and May 31. Some market participants, however, may prefer more immediate delivery than a NYMEX WTI futures contract provides. Consequently, these market participants will instead turn to shorter-term spot price alternatives.

Taken together, these attributes help to explain the variety of prices used in the North American crude oil market. These markers price most of the crude oils commonly used by U.S. buyers and cover a wide geographic area.

Principal contributor: Jesse Barnett

May, 28 2020
Financial Review: 2019

Key findings

  • Brent crude oil daily average prices were $64.16 per barrel in 2019—11% lower than 2018 levels
  • The 102 companies analyzed in this study increased their combined liquids and natural gas production 2% from 2018 to 2019
  • Proved reserves additions in 2019 were about the same as the 2010–18 annual average
  • Finding plus lifting costs increased 13% from 2018 to 2019
  • Occidental Petroleum’s acquisition of Anadarko Petroleum contributed to the largest reserve acquisition costs incurred for the group of companies since 2016
  • Refiners’ earnings per barrel declined slightly from 2018 to 2019

See entire annual review

May, 26 2020