A Bloomberg analyst pointed out that the recent share market rally in Singapore was underpinned by stocks of ship and oil rig-makers, despite the sectors’ fundamentals being weak. The rally, he concluded, was floating on a bit of foam.
Since the crash of oil prices in late 2014, the Singapore offshore services and engineering industry has been hit hard. Anticipating that the good times would continue – always a fallacy – all the capital expenditure and debt incurred from oil’s boom over 2009-2014 came back to haunt the sector after upstream work dried up in the past two years.
Singapore, being the nexus of much of the rig-building, offshore vessel and mechanical engineering contracting in Asia, has been hit the hardest. It came with a delay; the hope was that oil prices recover in 2016 after plunging in early 2015, but that never came. So when Swiber Holdings declared bankruptcy last August, it was a surprise to no one in the industry. In such a downturn, there are always casualties, and other companies – Swissco, Ezion Holdings, KrisEnergy – were also facing critical times. Debt holders of these companies, mainly Singapore banks, had to take a haircut. In response, the financial industry tightened up its portfolios while the Singapore government pledged to aid the industry, but stopped short to bailing the companies out.
The saga continued last week. Industry darling Ezra Holdings – once worth US$2 billion – filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the USA. The international filing is unusual, but it does offer legal and enforcement action protection worldwide, as it attempts to restructure. Also declaring Chapter 11 are related entities Ezra Marine Services and EMAS IT Solution, and possibly also circling the drain is Ezra Holdings’ debt-ridden subsidiary Emas Chiyoda Subsea, which owes the former some US$170 million. Ezra Holdings’ last published earnings declared losses of US$339.6 million, with US$1.51 billion of liabilities. Court filings show that its 20 largest creditors are owed some US$600 million; one – Norwegian shipowner Forland Subsea AS – has agreed not to pursue to repayment of a defaulted charter payment, but the rest are not being so patient.
As Ezra Holdings battles to survive, new concerns over the health of the industry have been cast. Though some argue that Ezra was poorly managed and over leveraged to begin with, it may not be reflective of all other players in the industry. However, investors seem sanguine for now. The banks, for example, have already identified Ezra as a threat, with DBS moving its US$270 debt owed to ‘non-performing’ while OCBC has been stress-testing the sector since Q32015. The financial industry, by and large, has already reduced its exposure to this murky pool, but turbulence beneath the surface still threatens the industry itself. Analysts and auditors are already looking for the next trouble – with Malaysian vessel builder Nam Cheong, Singapore’s Loyz Energy and Rickmers Maritime named as potential threats. Yet, there are those that are hunting for a bargain – British engineering specialists Subsea 7 has expressed interest in purchasing Ezra Holdings assets, as well as those of its embattled joint venture Emas Chiyoda Subsea.
With oil prices having recovered somewhat, the forecast might be brighter, but brace yourself, there are still squalls to come as the upstream industry further consolidates and reinvents itself. Oil companies are putting a lot more cost pressure across their supply chain, and offshore marine contractors are not excluded from this picture. Previous charters rates will certainly not re-appear in the medium terms at least hence the business model of vessel owners will need serious tweaking. Those willing innovate and put their re-engineering skills to use, may look at diversifying their business into offshore renewable energy and other seabed mining sectors.
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
In its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts that natural gas-fired electricity generation in the United States will increase by 6% in 2019 and by 2% in 2020. EIA also forecasts that generation from wind power will increase by 6% in 2019 and by 14% in 2020. These trends vary widely among the regions of the country; growth in natural gas generation is highest in the mid-Atlantic region and growth in wind generation is highest in Texas. EIA expects coal-fired electricity generation to decline nationwide, falling by 15% in 2019 and by 9% in 2020.
The trends in projected generation reflect changes in the mix of generating capacity. In the mid-Atlantic region, which is mostly in the PJM Interconnection transmission area, the electricity industry has added more than 12 gigawatts (GW) of new natural gas-fired generating capacity since the beginning of 2018, an increase of 17%.
This new natural gas capacity in PJM has replaced some coal-fired generating capacity—6 GW of coal-fired generation capacity has been retired in that region since the beginning of 2018. The Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in New Jersey was also retired in 2018, and the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania plans to shut down its last remaining reactor this month.
These changes in capacity contribute to EIA’s forecast that natural gas will fuel 39% of electricity generation in the PJM region in 2020, up from a share of 31% in 2018. In contrast, coal is expected to generate 20% of PJM electricity next year, down from 28% in 2018. In 2010, coal fueled 54% of the region’s electricity generation, and natural gas generated 11%.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook
Wind power has been the fastest-growing source of electricity in recent years in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region that serves most of Texas. Since the beginning of 2018, the industry has added 3 GW of wind generating capacity and plans to add another 7 GW before the end of 2020. These additions would result in an increase of nearly 50% from the 2017 wind capacity level in ERCOT. EIA expects wind to supply 20% of ERCOT total generation in 2019 and 24% in 2020. If realized, wind would match coal’s share of ERCOT's electricity generation this year and exceed it in 2020.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook
Natural gas-fired generation in ERCOT has fluctuated in recent years in response to changes in the cost of the fuel. EIA forecasts the Henry Hub natural gas price will fall by 21% in 2019, which contributes to EIA’s expectation that ERCOT’s natural gas generation share will rise from 45% in 2018 to 47% this year. Although EIA forecasts next year’s natural gas prices to remain relatively flat in 2020, the large increase in renewable generating capacity is expected to reduce the region’s 2020 natural gas generation share to 41%.
Headline crude prices for the week beginning 9 September 2019 – Brent: US$61/b; WTI: US$56/b
Headlines of the week
Detailed market research and continuous tracking of market developments—as well as deep, on-the-ground expertise across the globe—informs our outlook on global gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG). We forecast gas demand and then use our infrastructure and contract models to forecast supply-and-demand balances, corresponding gas flows, and pricing implications to 2035.Executive summary
The past year saw the natural-gas market grow at its fastest rate in almost a decade, supported by booming domestic markets in China and the United States and an expanding global gas trade to serve Asian markets. While the pace of growth is set to slow, gas remains the fastest-growing fossil fuel and the only fossil fuel expected to grow beyond 2035.Global gas: Demand expected to grow 0.9 percent per annum to 2035
While we expect coal demand to peak before 2025 and oil demand to peak around 2033, gas demand will continue to grow until 2035, albeit at a slower rate than seen previously. The power-generation and industrial sectors in Asia and North America and the residential and commercial sectors in Southeast Asia, including China, will drive the expected gas-demand growth. Strong growth from these regions will more than offset the demand declines from the mature gas markets of Europe and Northeast Asia.
Gas supply to meet this demand will come mainly from Africa, China, Russia, and the shale-gas-rich United States. China will double its conventional gas production from 2018 to 2035. Gas production in Europe will decline rapidly.LNG: Demand expected to grow 3.6 percent per annum to 2035, with market rebalancing expected in 2027–28
We expect LNG demand to outpace overall gas demand as Asian markets rely on more distant supplies, Europe increases its gas-import dependence, and US producers seek overseas markets for their gas (both pipe and LNG). China will be a major driver of LNG-demand growth, as its domestic supply and pipeline flows will be insufficient to meet rising demand. Similarly, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and South Asia will rely on LNG to meet the growing demand to replace declining domestic supplies. We also expect Europe to increase LNG imports to help offset declining domestic supply.
Demand growth by the middle of next decade should balance the excess LNG capacity in the current market and planned capacity additions. We expect that further capacity growth of around 250 billion cubic meters will be necessary to meet demand to 2035.
With growing shale-gas production in the United States, the country is in a position to join Australia and Qatar as a top global LNG exporter. A number of competing US projects represent the long-run marginal LNG-supply capacity.Key themes uncovered
Over the course of our analysis, we uncovered five key themes to watch for in the global gas market: