Rumours are swirling that the world’s largest IPO ever, might just slip a few months into 2019. Though Saudi Finance Minister Mohammed al-Jadaan told investors just recently on the 25th of September that the IPO of Saudi state oil giant Aramco will proceed as planned in 2018. Saudi Aramco said in a statement that the IPO remains ‘on track’, underlining that it was committed to ensuring high standards.
However, there are a few big questions that have not been answered. The question of where Aramco will list has still yet to be answered. It will float on the domestic stock exchange in Riyadh, that is certain, but an IPO this size needs a major international exchange. The options for that would be either London or New York. Neither has been selected yet. It appears that Aramco will only formally announce this in late October, when a big investment conference in Riyadh is scheduled.
Once it is confirmed where Aramco will float, then the rest of the preparatory work can continue – having been contingent on this choice. It is a tight timeframe; 12 months is a short span to iron out all details and kinks, which is why the IPO may very well slip into the early months of 2019. But meanwhile, Aramco is taking steps to restructure itself into a contemporary supermajor, instead of the state entity it has always operated as.
In the past few months, Aramco has struck strategic partnerships with several key countries as it moves from simply selling crude, to ensuring its crude has place and space in a competitive world. It is deploying new technology in the Rub al Khalid – the vast Empty Quarter – that could help shore up and increase crude reserves. It has taken full ownership of Motiva in the US, home to the largest refinery in America. Mega-refinery partnerships have been signed in China, India and Malaysia – ensuring captive demand. And just last week, Aramco announced that would be buying and selling non-Saudi crude for the first time even.
That will form the lynchpin of an expanded trading business, which will put crude marketing and refined product trading under the same management. Currently, both are separate. Crude selling is crude selling, done in Singapore and Dahran. And refined products, which already includes non-Saudi fuels, is done out of London. Combining the two under one structure is a shift in policy for Aramco, approximating the arrangement of something like ExxonMobil, PetroChina or Glencore. Trading of Saudi crude will still be a priority, but expanding coverage will help Saudi Trading – set to be based in Singapore – cover its supply chain more efficiently to plug in gaps as they appear, as well as become a strong profit driver in its own right. This would be unthinkable five years ago. But to appeal to international investors, Aramco has to show them that its businesses are on part with the biggest international companies.
At home, Saudi Arabia is also planning to phase out subsidies for gasoline and jet fuel, which would lit them up by almost 80% to international levels. Prices for gasoil and fuel oil – both heavily used in power generation, particularly in summer – will be reformed, at a more gradual pace. Saudi Arabia also plans to introduce value-added tax (VAT), scheduled to be implemented at the start of 2018. Details of the Citizen’s Account, a household allowance scheme intended to reduce the impact of austerity policies on low and middle-income Saudi families would be announced in the coming weeks. While this is mainly focused on balancing the government’s budget, it has a knock-on effect on Aramco. Previously, Aramco only had to answer to the Saudi King when it came to diverting funds from the company to balance out the rest of the economy. As a publicly traded company, this will come under intense scrutiny. By removing subsidies, it removes a drain on the Aramco coffers, which is a necessary change for a publicly-traded company. Too long has the country been dependent on Saudi Aramco as the national bank account. This IPO is a chance to restructure and rejuvenate the entire economy, making it leaner, fitter and more competitive.
All of this makes a delay in the IPO more and more likely. This isn’t just a simple floating of shares. This is an attempt to remake the world’s most valuable company and an entire country to be more dynamic economically and modern. In that context, waiting a few more months to ensure every checkbox is ticked is far, far better in the long run.
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
Pioneering technology expert tells ADIPEC Energy Dialogue up to 80 per cent of plant shutdowns could be mitigated through combination of advanced electrification, automation and digitalisation technologies
Greater use of renewables in power management processes offers oil and gas companies opportunities to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects
Abu Dhabi, UAE – XX August 2020 – Leveraging the synergies created by the convergence of electrification, automation and digitalisation, can create significant cost savings for oil and gas companies when making both operational and capital investment decisions, according to Dr Peter Terwiesch, President of Industrial Automation at ABB, a Swiss-Swedish multinational company, operating mainly in robotics, power, heavy electrical equipment, and automation technology areas.
Participating in the latest ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, Dr Terwiesch said up to 80 per cent of energy industry plant shutdowns, caused by human error, or rotating machinery or power outages, could be mitigated through a combination of electrification, automation and digitalisation.
“Savings are clearly possible not only on the operation side but also, using the same synergies between dimensions, you can bring down the cost schedule and risk of capital investment, especially in a time when making projects work economically is harder,” explained Dr Terwiesch.
A pioneering technology leader, who works closely with utility, industry, transportation and infrastructure customers, Dr Terwiesch said despite the increasing investment by oil and gas companies in renewables and the growing use of renewables to generate electricity, both for individual and industrial uses, hydrocarbons will continue to have an important role in creating energy, in the short to medium term.
“If you look at the energy density constraints, clearly electricity is gaining share but electricity is not the source of energy; it is a conduit of energy. The energy has to come from somewhere and that can be hydrocarbons, or nuclear, or renewables.” he said.
Nevertheless, he added, the greater use of renewables to generate electricity offers oil and gas companies the option of integrating a higher share of renewables into power management processes to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects.
The ADIPEC Energy Dialogue is a series of online thought leadership events created by dmg events, organisers of the annual Abu Dhabi International Exhibition and Conference. Featuring key stakeholders and decision-makers in the oil and gas industry, the dialogues focus on how the industry is evolving and transforming in response to the rapidly changing energy market.
With this year’s in person ADIPEC exhibition and conference postponed to November 2021, the ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, along with insightful webinars, podcasts and on line panels continue to connect the oil and gas industry, with the challenges and opportunities shaping energy markets in the run up to, and following, a planned three-day live stream virtual ADIPEC conference taking place from November 9-11.
An industry first of its kind, the online conference will bring together energy leaders, ministers and global oil and gas CEOs to assess the collective measures the industry needs to put in place to fast-track recovery, post COVID-19.
To watch the full ADIPEC Energy Dialogue series go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZzUd32n3_s&t=6s
Utility-scale battery storage systems are increasingly being installed in the United States. In 2010, the United States had seven operational battery storage systems, which accounted for 59 megawatts (MW) of power capacity (the maximum amount of power output a battery can provide in any instant) and 21 megawatthours (MWh) of energy capacity (the total amount of energy that can be stored or discharged by a battery). By the end of 2018, the United States had 125 operational battery storage systems, providing a total of 869 MW of installed power capacity and 1,236 MWh of energy capacity.
Battery storage systems store electricity produced by generators or pulled directly from the electrical grid, and they redistribute the power later as needed. These systems have a wide variety of applications, including integrating renewables into the grid, peak shaving, frequency regulation, and providing backup power.
Most utility-scale battery storage capacity is installed in regions covered by independent system operators (ISOs) or regional transmission organizations (RTOs). Historically, most battery systems are in the PJM Interconnection (PJM), which manages the power grid in 13 eastern and Midwestern states as well as the District of Columbia, and in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). Together, PJM and CAISO accounted for 55% of the total battery storage power capacity built between 2010 and 2018. However, in 2018, more than 58% (130 MW) of new storage power capacity additions, representing 69% (337 MWh) of energy capacity additions, were installed in states outside of those areas.
In 2018, many regions outside of CAISO and PJM began adding greater amounts of battery storage capacity to their power grids, including Alaska and Hawaii, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO). Many of the additions were the result of procurement requirements, financial incentives, and long-term planning mechanisms that promote the use of energy storage in the respective states. Alaska and Hawaii, which have isolated power grids, are expanding battery storage capacity to increase grid reliability and reduce dependence on expensive fossil fuel imports.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report
Note: The cost range represents cost data elements from the 25th to 75th percentiles for each year of reported cost data.
Average costs per unit of energy capacity decreased 61% between 2015 and 2017, dropping from $2,153 per kilowatthour (kWh) to $834 per kWh. The large decrease in cost makes battery storage more economical, helping accelerate capacity growth. Affordable battery storage also plays an important role in the continued integration of storage with intermittent renewable electricity sources such as wind and solar.
Additional information on these topics is available in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) recently updated Battery Storage in the United States: An Update on Market Trends. This report explores trends in battery storage capacity additions and describes the current state of the market, including information on applications, cost, market and policy drivers, and future project developments.