The history of OPEC and how it came to wield such power is one of two entities. On one hand, is OPEC – a coalition of the world’s largest oil producers. On the other, America, and to a lesser extent Europe, dependent on the former for energy. It worked in the 1970s, when the oil shocks proved the potency of supply restrictions. In the decades since then, OPEC has lost a lot of power. Sources of oil and gas have diversified. The USA is now on track to be a net exporter of crude and natural gas. Europe is charging towards a future that diminishes the need for hydrocarbons. And OPEC is no longer the biggest boy in town; Russia is now the world’s single largest oil producer – and has been China’s top oil supplier for several years now.
Back in 2015, as the energy industry was grappling with the aftermath of plunging prices, Russia stated that it had ‘no intention of cooperating with Saudi Arabia.’ Yet, just last week, the Saudi King Salman visited Russia. A joint US$1 billion fund was announced to invest in energy projects. In the space of two years, Russia has gone from OPEC’s main competitor to an unofficial co-president, brokering the current supply deal that has been credited for keeping oil prices stable (or at least, not plunging).
With Donald Trump’s presidency in the USA, former allies and enemies are looking to form new alliances. Even Angela Merkel was forced to admit that the EU now had to consider ‘a future without the USA.’ For Russia, the American presidency has been extremely challenging to work with, especially with the recent Congress-led sanctions. This bites down hard on Russia’s ability to do business. With the EU also threading a delicate relationship, Russia has to find new friends.
King Salman of Saudi Arabia does not do courtesy visits. His arrival in Russia – the first ever for a Saudi monarch – is a geopolitical earthquake.
It seals a strategic energy partnership that began a year ago, which has since blossomed into a new bromance – with Saudi Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih and Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak presenting a united front. The announced US$1 billion fund is reportedly merely the ‘tip of the iceberg’, with more cooperation and joint ventures to be announced. Russia could use a lot of financial help in exploiting Arctic hydrocarbon resources – and with financial flows disrupted by American sanctions, can turn to Saudi Arabia’s deep pockets. This fits into the Saudi roadmap to expand its own infrastructure and industrial sector to diversify the economy. It also extends far beyond energy – Saudi Arabia agreed to a massive military equipment purchase from Russia, a fundamental shift in its military policy that has always sourced from the US and UK.
For Saudi Arabia, it is also an opportunity to win back power for OPEC. Cooperation with Russia is cooperation with OPEC by proxy. There are rumblings that this Saudi-Russia friendship could eventually lead to Russia becoming an official member of OPEC. It is halfway there already. The current OPEC supply freeze would not have been possible without Russian cooperation, and their help in convincing other major non-OPEC producers in Central Asia to reduce production. With the March 2018 expiry looming for the current deal, Russia is already signalling that it would like to extend the deal.
Alone, Saudi Arabia would face a challenge in this – there is a lot of conflict with other members like Iran, Iraq and Qatar. But add in Russia, and suddenly Saudi Arabia’s position becomes a whole lot more powerful, as it is able to throw its weight around like the good ol’ days in the 1970s. With US crude production rising, the main threat to Russian and Saudi oil fortunes is no longer each other, but America. A cooperation pact makes perfect sense. Which is exactly why this is now happening.
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
The global oilfield scale inhibitor market was valued at USD 509.4 Million in 2014 and is expected to witness a CAGR of 5.40% between 2015 and 2020. Factors driving the market of oilfield scale inhibitor include increasing demand from the oil and gas industry, wide availability of scale inhibitors, rising demand for biodegradable and environment-compatible scale inhibitors, and so on.
Download PDF Brochure @ https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=268225660
The oilfield scale inhibitor market is experiencing strong growth and is mainly driven by regions, such as RoW, North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. Considerable amount of investments are made by different market players to serve the end-user applications of scale inhibitors. The global market is segmented into major geographic regions, such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of the World (RoW). The market has also been segmented on the basis of type. On the basis of type of scale inhibitors, the market is sub-divided into phosphonates, carboxylate/acrylate, sulfonates, and others.
Carboxylate/acrylic are the most common type of oilfield scale inhibitor
Among the various types of scale inhibitors, the carboxylate/acrylate type holds the largest share in the oilfield scale inhibitor market. This large share is attributed to the increasing usage of this type of scale inhibitors compared to the other types. Carboxylate/acrylate meets the legislation requirement, abiding environmental norms due to the absence of phosphorus. Carboxylate/acrylate scale inhibitors are used in artificial cooling water systems, heat exchangers, and boilers.
RoW, which includes the Middle-East, Africa, and South America, is the most dominant region in the global oilfield scale inhibitor market
The RoW oilfield scale inhibitor market accounted for the largest share of the global oilfield scale inhibitor market, in terms of value, in 2014. This dominance is expected to continue till 2020 due to increased oil and gas activities in this region. The Middle-East, Africa, and South America have abundant proven oil and gas reserves, which will enable the rapid growth of the oilfield scale inhibitor market in these regions. Among the regions in RoW, Africa’s oilfield scale inhibitor market has the highest prospect for growth. Africa has a huge amount of proven oil reserves and is one of the leading oil producing region in the World. But political unrest coupled with lack of proper infrastructures may negatively affect oil and gas activities in this region.
Major players in this market are The Dow Chemical Company (U.S.), BASF SE (Germany), AkzoNobel Oilfield (The Netherlands), Kemira OYJ (Finland), Solvay S.A. (Belgium), Halliburton Company (U.S.), Schlumberger Limited (U.S.), Baker Hughes Incorporated (U.S.), Clariant AG (Switzerland), E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (U.S.), Evonik Industries AG (Germany), GE Power & Water Process Technologies (U.S.), Ashland Inc. (U.S.), and Innospec Inc. (U.S.).
Speak to Analyst @ https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/speaktoanalystNew.asp?id=268225660
Scope of the Report:
Get 10% FREE Customization on this Study @ https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestCustomizationNew.asp?id=268225660
Headline crude prices for the week beginning 9 December 2019 – Brent: US$64/b; WTI: US$59/b
Headlines of the week
In the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) International Energy Outlook 2019 (IEO2019), India has the fastest-growing rate of energy consumption globally through 2050. By 2050, EIA projects in the IEO2019 Reference case that India will consume more energy than the United States by the mid-2040s, and its consumption will remain second only to China through 2050. EIA explored three alternative outcomes for India’s energy consumption in an Issue in Focus article released today and a corresponding webinar held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Long-term energy consumption projections in India are uncertain because of its rapid rate of change magnified by the size of its economy. The Issue in Focus article explores two aspects of uncertainty regarding India’s future energy consumption: economic composition by sector and industrial sector energy intensity. When these assumptions vary, it significantly increases estimates of future energy consumption.
In the IEO2019 Reference case, EIA projects the economy of India to surpass the economies of the European countries that are part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the United States by the late 2030s to become the second-largest economy in the world, behind only China. In EIA’s analysis, gross domestic product values for countries and regions are expressed in purchasing power parity terms.
The IEO2019 Reference case shows India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growing from $9 trillion in 2018 to $49 trillion in 2050, an average growth rate of more than 5% per year, which is higher than the global average annual growth rate of 3% in the IEO2019 Reference case.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2019
India’s economic growth will continue to drive India’s growing energy consumption. In the IEO2019 Reference case, India’s total energy consumption increases from 35 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) in 2018 to 120 quadrillion Btu in 2050, growing from a 6% share of the world total to 13%. However, annually, the level of GDP in India has a lower energy consumption than some other countries and regions.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2019
In the Issue in Focus, three alternative cases explore different assumptions that affect India’s projected energy consumption:
EIA’s analysis shows that the country's industrial activity has a greater effect on India’s energy consumption than technological improvements. In the IEO2019 Composition and Combination cases, where the assumption is that economic growth is more concentrated in manufacturing, energy use in India grows at a greater rate because those industries have higher energy intensities.
In the IEO2019 Combination case, India’s industrial energy consumption grows to 38 quadrillion Btu more in 2050 than in the Reference case. This difference is equal to a more than 4% increase in 2050 global energy use.