NrgEdge Editor

Sharing content and articles for users
Last Updated: October 26, 2017
1 view
Business Trends
image

Last week in the world oil:


Prices

- There are no clear trends in crude prices, with Brent and WTI stuck in

their respective ranges of US$57/b and US$52/b. Reductions in US

drilling rates were offset by Iraqi supply disruptions, while OPEC’s hints

that the supply freeze will persist did little to move the market.


Upstream

- Mexico is planning a third auction in 2018, hiking up the pace as the

country seeks to exploit new-found private interest in its hydrocarbons in

a election year. The auction will focus on conventional onshore oil and gas

blocks, with terms to be announced early 2018 and awarded by mid-

2018. This joins the planned deepwater Gulf auction scheduled by

January 2018 and a shallow water auction in March 2018.

- BP and SOCAR will sign a new production-sharing agreement for a new

block, D-230, in the North Absheron basin of the Caspian Sea. With equal

stakes, this cements BP as the main international player in Azerbaijan,

with existing stakes in the Azer-Chirag- Guneshli and Shah Deniz fields.

- Thailand’s PTTEP is delaying the FID for the Mariana Oil Sands project in

Canada, the latest holdup in the region’s once booming oil sands sector.

There is a high likelihood that the project, 100% owned by PTTEP, may be

dropped, given the company’s recent focus on midstream and gas.

- The US active rig count dropped by 15 last week – 7 oil and 8 gas – as

drilling activity retreats against stagnant oil prices. All rig losses were

onshore, with the most declines in the Haynesville and Permian basins.


Downstream & Midstream

- Nigeria has announced that the planned 650 kb/d Dangote refinery, being

built by Africa’s richest man Aliko Dangote, will come onstream by end-

2019, which would help ease the country’s growing dependence on

imports. Envisioned as Nigeria’s own Jamnagar refinery, an operational

Dangote refinery will also ease the pressure on NNPC, which has been

struggling to find partners to help revamp its three existing refineries.


Natural Gas and LNG

- Natural gas action in the Eastern Mediterranean is heating up. With Egypt,

Israel, Greece and Cyprus already exploiting resources, Energean Oil &

Gas is backing a new player: Montenegro. Two blocks explored by the

Greek company hold an estimated 1.8 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas

reserves, with Energean CEO Mathios Rigas saying that Montenegro is

sitting in the ‘sweet spot of untapped potential in the eastern Adriatic.’

Energean was awarded a 30-year licence for the blocks in March 2017.

- Russia’s Novatek is planning to expand the Yamal LNG by one more train.

With an additional capacity of 1 mtpa, the smaller fourth train is planned

for end-2019, with Yamal Trains 2 & 3 tracking ahead of schedule.


Corporate

- BP’s Chariman Carl-Henric Svanberg has announced his retirement after

steering the supermajor through the Deepwater Horizon disaster just

months after he assumed his position. Svanberg will remain in his

position until a successor is identified.


Last week in Asian oil


Upstream

- China will continue to be more and more dependent on imported crude,

as domestic production fell by 2.9% y-o- y to 3.78 mmb/d in September.

Low oil prices have made some marginal and ageing fields uneconomic,

exacerbating the country’s declining trend. Domestic natural gas output,

however, was up 10.7% y-o- y to 11.15 bcm, bringing YTD gas production

up by 9.1% y-o- y. With China’s private sector shying away from

developing the country’s ast shale oil and gas reserves after yeas of

limited success, the outlook is poor. Which makes recent deals like CEFC

China Energy’s US$9.1 billion investment in Rosneft more important, as it

gives China access to up to 260,000 bpd of Russian oil. China has also

apparently offered to purchase outright 5% of Saudi Aramco, potentially

circumventing the Saudi Arabian firm’s IPO ambitions.

- As Iraq’s strife with its rebel Kurdish province wanes following the

capture of Kirkuk, the country has wasted no time in making plans to

exploit the region’s large oil reserves. Iraqi Oil Minister announced plans

to collaborate with international investors to double oil production at the

northern Kirkuk fields to exceed one mmb/d. However, Iraq is unlikely to

work with Rosneft – as the Russia producer announced a deal with Iraqi

Kurdistan authorities to operate an oil export pipeline and purchase

stakes in five oil blocks for up to US$400 million. It may have lost Kirkuk,

but Iraqi Kurdistan still controls three northern provinces, and its only

outlet to export its crude is through a pipeline through Turkey, which is

under jeopardy from the recent independence referendum. The Rosneft

pipeline project, together with current Kurdish pipeline operator Kar

Group, would provide an alternative supply route… but continue to stoke

domestic tensions with the central Iraqi government.

- As Shell finalises its exit from the Iraqi upstream oil sector, Total is

gunning to fill the void left by the supermajor, which is focusing on

natural gas production in Basra. Total is reportedly aiming for the

Majnoon oilfield as well as the Nassiriya oil and gas project, both in the

south, signalling its interest to the Iraqi Oil Minister.

- Indonesia will be launching its second oil and gas licenceround for 2017

in November, despite the first auction’s deadline having been pushed

back twice. Acreage to be offered in the second round will comprise both

conventional and unconventional blocks. Delays are expected, given that

the government is still fine-tuning new upstream regulations that will

govern the gross split mechanism applicable to new E&P contracts – the

cause of the first 2017 round’s repeated postponements.


Natural Gas & LNG

- Indonesia has agreed to extend Inpex’s contract to operate the Masela

natural gas field by up to 27 years once the current contract expires in

2028. This comes after Inpex lobbied for the extension, given that

President Joko Widodo’s decision to reject a planned US$15 billion FLNG

facility in favour of an onshore facility had pushed anticipated start of

production by several years to the late 2020s. The extension – a standard

20-year extension and an additional seven years as compensation for

changing the LNG refinery development plan – was necessary assurance

for Inpex and its partner Shell to proceed with the project.

3
3 0

Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today

Latest NrgBuzz

Average U.S. construction costs for solar and wind generation continue to fall

According to 2018 data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for newly constructed utility-scale electric generators in the United States, annual capacity-weighted average construction costs for solar photovoltaic systems and onshore wind turbines have continued to decrease. Natural gas generator costs also decreased slightly in 2018.

From 2013 to 2018, costs for solar fell 50%, costs for wind fell 27%, and costs for natural gas fell 13%. Together, these three generation technologies accounted for more than 98% of total capacity added to the electricity grid in the United States in 2018. Investment in U.S. electric-generating capacity in 2018 increased by 9.3% from 2017, driven by natural gas capacity additions.

Solar
The average construction cost for solar photovoltaic generators is higher than wind and natural gas generators on a dollar-per-kilowatt basis, although the gap is narrowing as the cost of solar falls rapidly. From 2017 to 2018, the average construction cost of solar in the United States fell 21% to $1,848 per kilowatt (kW). The decrease was driven by falling costs for crystalline silicon fixed-tilt panels, which were at their lowest average construction cost of $1,767 per kW in 2018.

Crystalline silicon fixed-tilt panels—which accounted for more than one-third of the solar capacity added in the United States in 2018, at 1.7 gigawatts (GW)—had the second-highest share of solar capacity additions by technology. Crystalline silicon axis-based tracking panels had the highest share, with 2.0 GW (41% of total solar capacity additions) of added generating capacity at an average cost of $1,834 per kW.

average construction costs for solar photovoltaic electricity generators

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

Wind
Total U.S. wind capacity additions increased 18% from 2017 to 2018 as the average construction cost for wind turbines dropped 16% to $1,382 per kW. All wind farm size classes had lower average construction costs in 2018. The largest decreases were at wind farms with 1 megawatt (MW) to 25 MW of capacity; construction costs at these farms decreased by 22.6% to $1,790 per kW.

average construction costs for wind farms

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

Natural gas
Compared with other generation technologies, natural gas technologies received the highest U.S. investment in 2018, accounting for 46% of total capacity additions for all energy sources. Growth in natural gas electric-generating capacity was led by significant additions in new capacity from combined-cycle facilities, which almost doubled the previous year’s additions for that technology. Combined-cycle technology construction costs dropped by 4% in 2018 to $858 per kW.

average construction costs for natural gas-fired electricity generators

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

September, 17 2020
Fossil fuels account for the largest share of U.S. energy production and consumption

Fossil fuels, or energy sources formed in the Earth’s crust from decayed organic material, including petroleum, natural gas, and coal, continue to account for the largest share of energy production and consumption in the United States. In 2019, 80% of domestic energy production was from fossil fuels, and 80% of domestic energy consumption originated from fossil fuels.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes the U.S. total energy flow diagram to visualize U.S. energy from primary energy supply (production and imports) to disposition (consumption, exports, and net stock additions). In this diagram, losses that take place when primary energy sources are converted into electricity are allocated proportionally to the end-use sectors. The result is a visualization that associates the primary energy consumed to generate electricity with the end-use sectors of the retail electricity sales customers, even though the amount of electric energy end users directly consumed was significantly less.

U.S. primary energy production by source

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

The share of U.S. total energy production from fossil fuels peaked in 1966 at 93%. Total fossil fuel production has continued to rise, but production has also risen for non-fossil fuel sources such as nuclear power and renewables. As a result, fossil fuels have accounted for about 80% of U.S. energy production in the past decade.

Since 2008, U.S. production of crude oil, dry natural gas, and natural gas plant liquids (NGPL) has increased by 15 quadrillion British thermal units (quads), 14 quads, and 4 quads, respectively. These increases have more than offset decreasing coal production, which has fallen 10 quads since its peak in 2008.

U.S. primary energy overview and net imports share of consumption

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

In 2019, U.S. energy production exceeded energy consumption for the first time since 1957, and U.S. energy exports exceeded energy imports for the first time since 1952. U.S. energy net imports as a share of consumption peaked in 2005 at 30%. Although energy net imports fell below zero in 2019, many regions of the United States still import significant amounts of energy.

Most U.S. energy trade is from petroleum (crude oil and petroleum products), which accounted for 69% of energy exports and 86% of energy imports in 2019. Much of the imported crude oil is processed by U.S. refineries and is then exported as petroleum products. Petroleum products accounted for 42% of total U.S. energy exports in 2019.

U.S. primary energy consumption by source

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

The share of U.S. total energy consumption that originated from fossil fuels has fallen from its peak of 94% in 1966 to 80% in 2019. The total amount of fossil fuels consumed in the United States has also fallen from its peak of 86 quads in 2007. Since then, coal consumption has decreased by 11 quads. In 2019, renewable energy consumption in the United States surpassed coal consumption for the first time. The decrease in coal consumption, along with a 3-quad decrease in petroleum consumption, more than offset an 8-quad increase in natural gas consumption.

EIA previously published articles explaining the energy flows of petroleum, natural gas, coal, and electricity. More information about total energy consumption, production, trade, and emissions is available in EIA’s Monthly Energy Review.

Principal contributor: Bill Sanchez

September, 15 2020
Nord Stream 2: Democratic Ideals or Business Reality

It was an innocuous set of words published in a newspaper in Germany on Sunday. “I hope the Russian do not force us to change our position on Nord Stream 2”, the German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas was quoted as saying. A day after that, Angela Merkel also issued a single sentence: “The German Chancellor agrees with the Foreign Minister’s comments from the weekend.” Simple words with a bold message. And potentially devastating consequences.

The incident that hardened the hearts of Germany , which had become increasingly isolated over the issue of the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline that connects Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea, was the hospitalisation of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Airlifted to Berlin following a medically-induced coma, German doctors concluded that Navalny, who is no stranger to intimidation tactics by the Putin government, was the victim of the Novichok nerve agent. If that name sounds familiar, that’s because it made headlines in 2018 over the attempted assassination of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, UK. A lethal nerve agent developed in the 1970s in Soviet Russia, Novichok is among the deadliest poisons ever developed and is banned under the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The Kremlin, predictably, denies involvement in the alleged poisoning, dismissing the German allegations as untrue.

That this could be the straw that broke the Nord Stream 2 back is perhaps surprising. The Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline has survived many obstacles. Many, many obstacles. The sequel to the original 1,222km Nord Stream that was inaugurated in November 2011, Nord Stream 2 will add 1,230km more pipeline between Vyborg in Russia and Lubin in Germany, with nearly all of the entire 2,452km length already being laid. Championed by former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and inherited by Merkel, the Nord Stream pipelines were developed to meet Germany’s growing energy demand, as it moved away from burning coal and nuclear fission. However, it has attracted criticism from many quarters. From Germany’s neighbours including Poland, Denmark and Estonia concerned over the pipeline that passes through their waters. From the EU, concerned about making Germany too energy dependent from a ‘politically unreliable’ country. From the US, which has threatened and, indeed, imposed sanctions on companies involved in the project. Some would argue that the vociferous US involvement, championed by President Donald Trump is self-serving, meant to allow US energy exports to muscle in, but it still fits neatly into Germany’s Russian dependence issue.

Throughout all this drama, Angela Merkel has stood firm. She, and her centre-right party CDU, have supported Nord Stream somewhat unenthusiastically with the primary concerns being the business element. It will unravel Germany’s plans to become a natural gas hub, as it tries to drive an EU movement towards cleaner energy. Many of Germany’s largest companies,  include petrochemicals giant BASF and its energy arm Wintershall are also heavily invested in Nord Stream and the raw gas it will bring. It would also be a reputational risk to pull the plug on a project that is almost complete and set to be launched by the year’s end, and still leaves the critical question on how Germany will be able to address its energy deficit.

The business argument has overridden political concerns so far. But now a moral imperative has arisen through the attempted murder of Alexei Navalny, with his subsequent medical treatment in Berlin. This resonates in Germany particularly, since the country understands the historical consequences of authoritarian governments and the dangers it bring. The shifting of the political landscape, especially the rise of the Green Party has triggered a ferocious debate with high-ranking politicians from both the left and right calling for the project to be scrapped. Some are even arguing that Nord Stream 2 gas supply is no longer necessary, as the country’s energy requirements are now fundamentally shifting in a post-Covid 19 world.

If, and that is a very big if, the Nord Stream 2 is scrapped, that is at least US$9.4 billion down the drain and plenty more in collateral damage from peripheral activities. It will rock the boat when the usual Merkel instinct is to steady it. But the furore over an attempted assassination by one of the world’s deadliest methods no less, might be a stand that Germany is willing to take. After all, it knows first-hand the effects of an iron fist. Berlin has so far stood alone in advancing Nord Stream 2, even after the chorus of critics surrounding it grow louder and louder. If it were to kill the project, Germany could find plenty of supporters for that move and would be more than happy to offer themselves up as a role to scupper this ship. The options are varied, but one question remains that will influence the whole issue: how is Angela Merkel willing to go to take a stand over democratic ideals or business reality?

Market Outlook:

  • Crude price trading range: Brent – US$39-41/b, WTI – US$36-38/b
  • A second global acceleration in Covid-19 cases is hampering hopes that the worldwide economy will be able to return to normality by the year’s end, delaying the time it will take for crude demand to return to its pre-crisis level
  • With the summer driving season in the northern hemisphere coming to a close, US crude stockpiles are rising, driving down prices even though the US EIA raised its forecasts for 2020 to US$38.99 for WTI and US$41.90 for Brent
  • The downturn in prices was also driven by Saudi Arabia cutting its crude pricing for October sales by a larger-than-expected amount, especially for Asian shipments

END OF ARTICLE

Get timely updates about latest developments in oil & gas delivered to your inbox. Join our email list and get your targeted content regularly for free. Click here to join.

In this time of COVID-19, we have had to relook at the way we approach workplace learning. We understand that businesses can’t afford to push the pause button on capability building, as employee safety comes in first and mistakes can be very costly. That’s why we have put together a series of Virtual Instructor Led Training or VILT to ensure that there is no disruption to your workplace learning and progression.

Find courses available for Virtual Instructor Led Training through latest video conferencing technology.

September, 15 2020