NrgEdge Editor

Sharing content and articles for users
Last Updated: March 8, 2018
1 view
Business Trends
image

Market Watch

Headline crude prices for the week beginning 5 March 2017 – Brent: US$65/b; WTI: US$62/b

  • Crude oil prices began the week on a stronger note, bouncing back from market jitters of American plans to impose steep tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to trade on indications that US crude inventories continue to fall.
  • Tanks at the important storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma are at their lowest levels since 2014, as a booming American economy and backwardisation structure in futures trading encouraging drawdowns.
  • However, despite the fall in Cushing, overall US crude stockpiles rose more than expected – up by a preliminary estimate of 5.66 million barrels - providing some drag to the market.
  • The US is expected to become the world’s largest oil producer in 2019, overtaking Russia, with Saudi Arabia remaining the world’s largest exporter for the foreseeable future.
  • The upward march of American output remains the single largest drag on crude prices, and a key variable in determining direction, as the EIA confirmed that American production shattered a 47-year old output record last November, hitting 10.044 mmb/d.
  • OPEC commented that while it was committed to ensuring the market was rebalance by mid-2018, it warned that there was a risk of an ‘upcoming energy crisis’, sown by the current seeds of under-investment.
  • The US active oil rig count hit 800 for the first time in almost three years, gaining a single site. Along with 2 new gas rigs, the US rig count stands at 981 as of last Friday.
  • Crude price outlook: Crude prices should stay steady this week, with prices in the US$65-66/b range for Brent and US$62-63/b for WTI.

Headlines of the week

Upstream

  • The hits keep coming for ExxonMobil in Guyana, as it and partner Hess made a seventh major offshore discovery in two years in the Pacora-1 well. Development will be folded into the plans for the Payara field, which should bring Guyanese output up to a potential 500,000 bpd.
  • While Turkey squabbles with Cyprus over gas fields, Greece is hoping to make its own discoveries, sanctioning development of four blocks in the west of the country by Total, Italy’s Edison and Hellenic Petroleum.
  • Mexico will be hoping that the shale revolution can begin within its borders, as it offers up nine onshore areas in Tamaulipas state that will be awarded to private firms for the first time in September.
  • Thawing relations with China, The Philippines has identified two offshore sites – SC-57 and SC-72 at Reed Bank – which could be prototypes for proposed joint upstream activities with China.
  • Bolivia’s YPFB has reportedly signed an MoU with Dubai’s Kampac Oil and London’s Milner Capital to jointly invest US$2.5 billion to developing the Madre de Dios oil and gas basin in northern Bolivia.
  • Japan’s Inpex has been awarded a 10% interest in Abu Dhabi’s Lower Zakum concession for 40 years; separately, Inpex’s stake in the Satah and Umm al Dalkh concession has also been extended for 25 years.

Downstream

  • After years of delays, Vietnam’s second oil refinery in Nghi Son is ready for commercial startup in April, processing Kuwaiti crude. The country’s third refinery, in Long Son, also broke ground last week.
  • Total is aiming to build and operate a 150 kb/d greenfield refinery in Iraq, which would be linked to the Nassirya oilfield. Originally planned for 300 kb/d, PetroChina and Lukoil are also reportedly interested.
  • Poland’s plan to push for a merger of its two state oil refiners – PKN Orlen and Lotos – has met with intense political opposition once again.
  • Tullow Oil and its partners expects to finalise the construction of an export pipeline – linking the inland Amosing and Ngamia fields to the port of Lamu – by mid-2018, clearing the way for output to begin in 2022.

Natural Gas/LNG

  • While there has been no damage to ExxonMobil’s gas pipeline in Papua New Guinea after a 7.5 magnitude quake, it will take 8 weeks to repair and restore production at the PNG LNG plant, with ExxonMobil declaring force majeure on all exports as it continues to assess damage to gas fields.
  • Dominion Energy’s Cove Point export terminal in Maryland, USA has been cleared for commercial startup, shipping its first LNG cargo to Europe, becoming the second American LNG export facility to operate.
  • Timor Leste and Australia are on the verge of agreeing on a permanent maritime border at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, paving the way to develop the Greater Sunrise offshore gas field that had been shelved previously due to disputed oceanic borders. 
  • There may finally be some movement in the Philippines’ planned LNG import facility, as four potential investors – including Tokyo Gas and domestic power player First Gen – have reportedly expressed interest.
  • Japan’s Jera and Marubeni are reportedly teaming up with Australia’s Fortescue Metals to build a 2 mtpa LNG import terminal in New South Wales, which would help ease the east coast natural gas crunch.
  • India has begun to receive its first US LNG as Cheniere begins its 20-year contract with GAIL, supplying 3.5 mtpa of LNG per year.

nrgedge news oilandgas energy weeklyupdate
3
1 0

Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today

Latest NrgBuzz

The United States now exports crude oil to more destinations than it imports from

As U.S. crude oil export volumes have increased to an average of 2.8 million barrels per day (b/d) in the first seven months of 2019, the number of destinations (which includes countries, territories, autonomous regions, and other administrative regions) that receive U.S. exports has also increased. Earlier this year, the number of U.S. crude oil export destinations surpassed the number of sources of U.S. crude oil imports that EIA tracks.

In 2009, the United States imported crude oil from as many as of 37 sources per month. In the first seven months of 2019, the largest number of sources in any month fell to 27. As the number of sources fell, the number of destinations for U.S. crude oil exports rose. In the first seven months of 2019, the United States exported crude oil to as many as 31 destinations per month.

This rise in U.S. export destinations coincides with the late 2015 lifting of restrictions on exporting domestic crude oil. Before the restrictions were lifted, U.S. crude oil exports almost exclusively went to Canada. Between January 2016 (the first full month of unrestricted U.S. crude oil exports) and July 2019, U.S. crude oil production increased by 2.6 million b/d, and export volumes increased by 2.2 million b/d.

monthly U.S. crude oil production and exports

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Monthly

The United States has also been importing crude oil from fewer of these sources largely because of the increase in domestic crude oil production. Most of this increase has been relatively light-sweet crude oil, but most U.S. refineries are configured to process medium- to heavy-sour crude oil. U.S. refineries have accommodated this increase in production by displacing imports of light and medium crude oils from countries other than Canada and by increasing refinery utilization rates.

Conversely, the United States has exported crude oil to more destinations because of growing demand for light-sweet crude oil abroad. Several infrastructure changes have allowed the United States to export this crude oil. New, expanded, or reversed pipelines have been delivering crude oil from production centers to export terminals. Export terminals have been expanded to accommodate greater crude oil tanker traffic, larger crude oil tankers, and larger cargo sizes.

More stringent national and international regulations limiting the sulfur content of transportation fuels are also affecting demand for light-sweet crude oil. Many of the less complex refineries outside of the United States cannot process and remove sulfur from heavy-sour crude oils and are better suited to process light-sweet crude oil into transportation fuels with lower sulfur content.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s monthly export data for crude oil and petroleum products come from the U.S. Census Bureau. For export values, Census trade data records the destinations of trade volumes, which may not be the ultimate destinations of the shipments.

October, 23 2019
Recalibrating Singapore’s Offshore Marine Industry

The state investment firm Temasek Holdings has made an offer to purchase control of Singaporean conglomerate Keppel Corp for S$4.1 billion. News of this has reverberated around the island, sparking speculation about what the new ownership structure could bring – particularly in the Singaporean rig-building sector.

Temasek already owns 20.5% of Keppel Corp. Its offer to increase its stake to 51% for S$4.1 billion would see it gain majority shareholding, allowing a huge amount of strategic flexibility. The deal would be through Temasek’s wholly-owned subsidiary Kyanite Investment Holdings, offering S$7.35 per share of Keppel Corp, a 26% premium of the traded price at that point. The financial analyst community have remarked that the bid is ‘fair’ and ‘reasonable’, and there appears to be no political headwinds against the deal being carried out with the exception of foreign and domestic regulatory approval.

The implications of the deal are far-ranging. Keppel Corp’s business ranges from property to infrastructure to telecommunications, including Keppel Land and a partial stake in major Singapore telco M1. Temasek has already said that it does not intend to delist and privatise Keppel Corp, and has a long-standing history of not interfering or getting involved in the operations or decisions of its portfolio companies.

This might be different. Speculation is that this move, if successful could lead to a restructuring of the Singapore offshore and marine industry. Since 2015, Singapore’s rig-building industry has been in the doldrums as global oil prices tumbled. Although prices have recovered, cost-cutting and investment reticence have provided a slower recovery for the industry. In Singapore, this has affected the two major rigbuilders – Keppel O&M and its rival Sembcorp Marine. In 2018, Keppel O&M reported a loss of over SS$100 million (although much improved from its previous loss of over SS$800 million); Sembcorp Marine, too, faces a challenging market, with a net loss of nearly 50 million. Temasek itself is already a majority shareholder in Sembcorp Marine.

Once Keppel Corp is under Temasek’s control, this could lead to consolidation in the industry. There are many pros to this, mainly the merging of rig-building operations and shipyards will put Singapore is a stronger position against giant shipyards of China and South Korea, which have been on an asset buying spree. With the overhang of the Sete Brasil scandal over as both Keppel O&M and Sembcorp Marine have settled corruption allegations over drillship and rig contracts, a merger is now increasingly likely. It would sort of backtrack from Temasek’s recent direction in steering away from fossil fuel investments (it had decided to not participate in the upcoming Saudi Aramco IPO for environmental concerns) but strengthening the Singaporeans O&M industry has national interest implications. As a representative of Temasek said of its portfolio – ‘(we are trying to) re-purpose some businesses to try and grasp the demands of tomorrow.’ So, if there is to be a tomorrow, then Singapore’s two largest offshore players need to start preparing for that now in the face of tremendous competition. And once again it will fall on the Singaporean government, through Temasek, to facilitate an arranged marriage for the greater good.

Keppel and Sembcorp O&M at a glance:

Keppel Offshore & Marine, 2018

  • Revenue: S$1.88 billion (up from S$1.80 billion)
  • Net Profit: -S$109 million (up from -S$826 million)
  • Contracts secured: S$1.7 billion

Sembcorp Marine, 2018

  • Turnover: S$4.88 billion (up from S$3.03 billion)
  • Net Profit: -S$48 million (down from S$157 million)
  • Contracts secured: S$1.2 billion
October, 22 2019
Global energy consumption driven by more electricity in residential, commercial buildings

Energy used in the buildings sector—which includes residential and commercial structures—accounted for 20% of global delivered energy consumption in 2018. In its International Energy Outlook 2019 (IEO2019) Reference case, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that global energy consumption in buildings will grow by 1.3% per year on average from 2018 to 2050. In countries that are not part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (non-OECD countries), EIA projects that energy consumed in buildings will grow by more than 2% per year, or about five times the rate of OECD countries.

building sector energy consumption

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2019 Reference case

Electricity—the main energy source for lighting, space cooling, appliances, and equipment—is the fastest-growing energy source in residential and commercial buildings. EIA expects that rising population and standards of living in non-OECD countries will lead to an increase in the demand for electricity-consuming appliances and personal equipment.

EIA expects that in the early 2020s, total electricity use in buildings in non-OECD countries will surpass electricity use in OECD countries. By 2050, buildings in non-OECD countries will collectively use about twice as much electricity as buildings in OECD countries.

average annual change in buildings sector electricity consumption

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2019 Reference case
Note: OECD is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

In the IEO2019 Reference case, electricity use by buildings in China is projected to increase more than any other country in absolute terms, but India will experience the fastest growth rate in buildings electricity use from 2018 to 2050. EIA expects that use of electricity by buildings in China will surpass that of the United States by 2030. By 2050, EIA expects China’s buildings will account for more than one-fifth of the electricity consumption in buildings worldwide.

As the quality of life in emerging economies improves with urbanization, rising income, and access to electricity, EIA projects that electricity’s share of the total use of energy in buildings will nearly double in non-OECD countries, from 21% in 2018 to 38% in 2050. By contrast, electricity’s share of delivered energy consumption in OECD countries’ buildings will decrease from 24% to 21%.

building sector electricity consumption per capita by region

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2019 Reference case
Note: OECD is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The per capita use of electricity in buildings in OECD countries will increase 0.6% per year between 2018 and 2050. The relatively slow growth is affected by improvements in building codes and improvements in the efficiency of appliances and equipment. Despite a slower rate of growth than non-OECD countries, OECD per capita electricity use in buildings will remain higher than in non-OECD countries because of more demand for energy-intensive services such as space cooling.

In non-OECD countries, the IEO2019 Reference case projects that per capita electricity use in buildings will grow by 2.5% per year, as access to energy expands and living standards rise, leading to increased use of electric-intensive appliances and equipment. This trend is particularly evident in India and China, where EIA projects that per capita electricity use in buildings will increase by 5.3% per year in India and 3.6% per year in China from 2018 to 2050.

October, 22 2019