EIA expects Brent crude oil prices to average $73 per barrel in the second half of 2018, then fall to $69 per barrel in 2019
In the July 2018 update of its Short–Term Energy Outlook (STEO), the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts that Brent crude oil prices will average $73 per barrel (b) in the second half of 2018 and $69/b in 2019. EIA expects West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices will average $7/b lower than Brent prices in the second half of 2018 and $7/b lower in 2019 (Figure 1).
EIA’s forecast of global liquid fuels balances indicates a looser oil market in the second half of 2018 and through the end of 2019 compared with the tight oil market conditions that prevailed in 2017 and the first half of 2018. Although global petroleum and other liquid fuels inventories declined by an average of 0.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2017, EIA expects inventories to be relatively unchanged in 2018 and to increase by 0.6 million b/d in 2019 (Figure 2).
The forecast inventory builds in 2019 are mainly the result of expected liquid fuels production growth in the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia. EIA forecasts that these countries will collectively provide 2.2 million b/d out of the 2.4 million b/d of total global supply growth in 2019. Supply growth of this magnitude would outpace EIA’s forecast for global liquid fuels consumption growth of 1.7 million b/d for 2019.
EIA forecasts total U.S. crude oil production to average 10.8 million b/d in 2018, up 1.4 million b/d from 2017, and 11.8 million b/d in 2019. If realized, the forecast level for both years would surpass the previous U.S. record of 9.6 million b/d set in 1970. Crude oil production at these forecast levels would probably make the United States the world’s leading crude oil producer in both years.
Increased production from tight rock formations within the Permian region in Texas and New Mexico accounts for 0.6 million b/d of the expected 1.2 million b/d of crude oil production growth from June 2018 to December 2019. The remaining increase comes from the Bakken, Eagle Ford, other regions in the Lower 48 states, and the Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico.
However, OECD inventory levels that have fallen below the five-year (2013–17) average and a forecast of low spare capacity among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) create conditions for possible price increases if additional supply disruptions occur or if forecast supply growth does not materialize (Figure 3). EIA expects OPEC surplus production capacity to average 1.7 million b/d in 2018 and to fall to 1.3 million b/d in 2019, a relatively low level compared with the 2008–17 average of 2.3 million b/d. Low OPEC crude oil surplus production capacity can be an indicator of tight oil market conditions. All of OPEC’s currently available surplus production capacity is in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.
EIA forecasts OPEC crude oil production to average 31.9 million b/d in 2018, a decrease of 0.6 million b/d compared with the 2017 level. The forecast decline is mainly the result of Venezuela’s rapidly decreasing crude oil production, which fell to less than 1.4 million b/d as of June 2018, a 0.6 million b/d decrease compared with June 2017. OPEC output during the first half of 2018 was also lower as a result of the production caps placed on the group’s producers as agreed upon in the November 2016 OPEC production agreement that aimed to limit OPEC crude oil output to 32.5 million b/d.
OPEC crude oil production averaged 31.9 million b/d in June. Although the OPEC and non-OPEC participants agreed on November 30, 2017, to extend the production cuts through the end of 2018 to reduce global oil inventories, tightening market conditions led the group to relax the production cuts starting in July 2018. EIA expects that OPEC crude oil output will decrease by an average of less than 0.1 million b/d in 2019. This small decline reflects crude oil production increases from some producers that would mostly offset expected combined declines of more than 1.0 million b/d in Iran and Venezuela.
U.S. average regular gasoline and diesel prices increase
The U.S. average regular gasoline retail price increased one cent from the previous week to $2.86 per gallon on July 9, up 56 cents from the same time last year. The Midwest and Gulf Coast prices each increased nearly two cents to $2.78 per gallon and $2.62 per gallon, respectively, the East Coast price increased one cent to $2.78 per gallon, and the West Coast price rose slightly, remaining virtually unchanged at $3.39 per gallon. The Rocky Mountain price decreased marginally, remaining virtually unchanged at $2.96 per gallon.
The U.S. average diesel fuel price increased less than a cent, remaining at $3.24 per gallon on July 9, up 76 cents from a year ago. The Rocky Mountain and East Coast prices each increased over a penny to $3.37 per gallon and $3.24 per gallon, respectively, the Midwest price rose nearly one cent to $3.18 per gallon, and the West Coast and Gulf Coast prices each rose slightly, remaining virtually unchanged at $3.75 per gallon and $3.00 per gallon, respectively.
Propane/propylene inventories rise
U.S. propane/propylene stocks increased by 2.4 million barrels last week to 63.6 million barrels as of July 6, 2018, 6.4 million barrels (9.2%) lower than the five-year average inventory level for this same time of year. Gulf Coast and Midwest inventories each increased by 1.2 million barrels and Rocky Mountain/West Coast inventories increased by 0.2 million barrels, while East Coast inventories decreased by 0.2 million barrels. Propylene non-fuel-use inventories represented 3.7% of total propane/propylene inventories.
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
Pioneering technology expert tells ADIPEC Energy Dialogue up to 80 per cent of plant shutdowns could be mitigated through combination of advanced electrification, automation and digitalisation technologies
Greater use of renewables in power management processes offers oil and gas companies opportunities to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects
Abu Dhabi, UAE – XX August 2020 – Leveraging the synergies created by the convergence of electrification, automation and digitalisation, can create significant cost savings for oil and gas companies when making both operational and capital investment decisions, according to Dr Peter Terwiesch, President of Industrial Automation at ABB, a Swiss-Swedish multinational company, operating mainly in robotics, power, heavy electrical equipment, and automation technology areas.
Participating in the latest ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, Dr Terwiesch said up to 80 per cent of energy industry plant shutdowns, caused by human error, or rotating machinery or power outages, could be mitigated through a combination of electrification, automation and digitalisation.
“Savings are clearly possible not only on the operation side but also, using the same synergies between dimensions, you can bring down the cost schedule and risk of capital investment, especially in a time when making projects work economically is harder,” explained Dr Terwiesch.
A pioneering technology leader, who works closely with utility, industry, transportation and infrastructure customers, Dr Terwiesch said despite the increasing investment by oil and gas companies in renewables and the growing use of renewables to generate electricity, both for individual and industrial uses, hydrocarbons will continue to have an important role in creating energy, in the short to medium term.
“If you look at the energy density constraints, clearly electricity is gaining share but electricity is not the source of energy; it is a conduit of energy. The energy has to come from somewhere and that can be hydrocarbons, or nuclear, or renewables.” he said.
Nevertheless, he added, the greater use of renewables to generate electricity offers oil and gas companies the option of integrating a higher share of renewables into power management processes to create efficiencies, sustainability and affordability when modernising equipment, or planning new CAPEX projects.
The ADIPEC Energy Dialogue is a series of online thought leadership events created by dmg events, organisers of the annual Abu Dhabi International Exhibition and Conference. Featuring key stakeholders and decision-makers in the oil and gas industry, the dialogues focus on how the industry is evolving and transforming in response to the rapidly changing energy market.
With this year’s in person ADIPEC exhibition and conference postponed to November 2021, the ADIPEC Energy Dialogue, along with insightful webinars, podcasts and on line panels continue to connect the oil and gas industry, with the challenges and opportunities shaping energy markets in the run up to, and following, a planned three-day live stream virtual ADIPEC conference taking place from November 9-11.
An industry first of its kind, the online conference will bring together energy leaders, ministers and global oil and gas CEOs to assess the collective measures the industry needs to put in place to fast-track recovery, post COVID-19.
To watch the full ADIPEC Energy Dialogue series go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZzUd32n3_s&t=6s
Utility-scale battery storage systems are increasingly being installed in the United States. In 2010, the United States had seven operational battery storage systems, which accounted for 59 megawatts (MW) of power capacity (the maximum amount of power output a battery can provide in any instant) and 21 megawatthours (MWh) of energy capacity (the total amount of energy that can be stored or discharged by a battery). By the end of 2018, the United States had 125 operational battery storage systems, providing a total of 869 MW of installed power capacity and 1,236 MWh of energy capacity.
Battery storage systems store electricity produced by generators or pulled directly from the electrical grid, and they redistribute the power later as needed. These systems have a wide variety of applications, including integrating renewables into the grid, peak shaving, frequency regulation, and providing backup power.
Most utility-scale battery storage capacity is installed in regions covered by independent system operators (ISOs) or regional transmission organizations (RTOs). Historically, most battery systems are in the PJM Interconnection (PJM), which manages the power grid in 13 eastern and Midwestern states as well as the District of Columbia, and in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). Together, PJM and CAISO accounted for 55% of the total battery storage power capacity built between 2010 and 2018. However, in 2018, more than 58% (130 MW) of new storage power capacity additions, representing 69% (337 MWh) of energy capacity additions, were installed in states outside of those areas.
In 2018, many regions outside of CAISO and PJM began adding greater amounts of battery storage capacity to their power grids, including Alaska and Hawaii, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO). Many of the additions were the result of procurement requirements, financial incentives, and long-term planning mechanisms that promote the use of energy storage in the respective states. Alaska and Hawaii, which have isolated power grids, are expanding battery storage capacity to increase grid reliability and reduce dependence on expensive fossil fuel imports.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report
Note: The cost range represents cost data elements from the 25th to 75th percentiles for each year of reported cost data.
Average costs per unit of energy capacity decreased 61% between 2015 and 2017, dropping from $2,153 per kilowatthour (kWh) to $834 per kWh. The large decrease in cost makes battery storage more economical, helping accelerate capacity growth. Affordable battery storage also plays an important role in the continued integration of storage with intermittent renewable electricity sources such as wind and solar.
Additional information on these topics is available in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) recently updated Battery Storage in the United States: An Update on Market Trends. This report explores trends in battery storage capacity additions and describes the current state of the market, including information on applications, cost, market and policy drivers, and future project developments.