Human resources practices of oil and gas companies need to integrate upskilling of their employees within its policy framework and future vision. As a best practice, it should be a continuous process and not just an instant fix during challenging times.
To further establish the importance of skill set upgradation in the oil and gas industry let us start with the definition:
What is Upskilling?
Upskilling is training an employee on new technology or process to improve his present capabilities. It makes the individual future-ready for upcoming technologies and methodologies, especially the ones related to his skill set and aptitude.
Why is it important to Upskill the workforce?
There are two major reasons:
Manual human labour is always at war with the rapid evolution of technology. New technologies have improved productivity by automating processes and replacing large-scale workforce with advanced machine-learning and AI tools.
This has in-turn led to an abundance of traditional talents and a steep rise in demand for experts who can control this new generation human-machine ecosystem. Upskilling in such a scenario can enable the workforce to use new technology and bridge the skill gap.
Also, it may be more expensive to hire new employees and train them rather than develop ways to nurture talent that’s already there in the company’s workforce; Upskilling is such a scenario will act as a strong retention strategy.
For example, in the last 1800s, rotary drills used to be in operation to drill out oil. Now, the oil and gas industry has technologies like seismic imaging and the latest measurement while drilling technology (MWD) to enhance the productivity of oil drilling. A drilling team that is well versed in the newest technology will always prove to be an asset to the company and vice-versa.
However, upskilling in not restricted to hard skills alone; In the energy industry, soft skills are vitally important, especially because of the rigorous nature of work. Professionals from diverse national backgrounds, cultures, and habits come together to work in the industry. They work in a difficult environment away from family and friends.
Interpersonal skills, ability to communicate clearly, and leadership capabilities are vital to keeping the team working and happy.
Skill set upgradation is a continuous process. Why?
It is quite unfortunate that the implementation of upgrading oneself be it learning new tools & technologies or keeping up with the latest industry trends is not proportional to the advancement of technologies. Hence there is always an imparity in demand and availability of talent.
The only way to bridge the gap between talent demand and supply is timely identification of industry trends and recalibrating oneself by learning the new.
Competition is a big driver of upskilling
Globalisation has opened up new markets. Needless to say, the recruitment department has witnessed a rapid growth of tech-savvy and competitive talent base. For the new-age engineers and entrepreneurs, technology is not something to learn; it is a way of life. When they join the global economy, they will steer everything on the motherboard of technology. The amalgamation of old and new talent would be incongruous if the industry stays away from this mission.
The oil and gas industry has its own downturns and upturns, but such is the importance of energy in the modern world, that it continues to be the force majeure in the economy.
Upskilling through technology courses, in-service training programmes, soft skill modules, and software skilling programmes can keep both employees and employers ready to face the competition and the future.
Nrgedge.net has for long partnered with the industry to equip energy personnel with advanced skill sets in various job profiles and positions. Visionary industry experts have lent their minds to design and develop the upskilling courses to facilitate the process of capability enhancement and professional advancement.
Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today
Headline crude prices for the week beginning 13 May 2019 – Brent: US$70/b; WTI: US$61/b
Headlines of the week
Midstream & Downstream
The world’s largest oil & gas companies have generally reported a mixed set of results in Q1 2019. Industry turmoil over new US sanctions on Venezuela, production woes in Canada and the ebb-and-flow between OPEC+’s supply deal and rising American production have created a shaky environment at the start of the year, with more ongoing as the oil world grapples with the removal of waivers on Iranian crude and Iran’s retaliation.
The results were particularly disappointing for ExxonMobil and Chevron, the two US supermajors. Both firms cited weak downstream performance as a drag on their financial performance, with ExxonMobil posting its first loss in its refining business since 2009. Chevron, too, reported a 65% drop in the refining and chemicals profit. Weak refining margins, particularly on gasoline, were blamed for the underperformance, exacerbating a set of weaker upstream numbers impaired by lower crude pricing even though production climbed. ExxonMobil was hit particularly hard, as its net profit fell below Chevron’s for the first time in nine years. Both supermajors did highlight growing output in the American Permian Basin as a future highlight, with ExxonMobil saying it was on track to produce 1 million barrels per day in the Permian by 2024. The Permian is also the focus of Chevron, which agreed to a US$33 billion takeover of Anadarko Petroleum (and its Permian Basin assets), only for the deal to be derailed by a rival bid from Occidental Petroleum with the backing of billionaire investor guru Warren Buffet. Chevron has now decided to opt out of the deal – a development that would put paid to Chevron’s ambitions to match or exceed ExxonMobil in shale.
Performance was better across the pond. Much better, in fact, for Royal Dutch Shell, which provided a positive end to a variable earnings season. Net profit for the Anglo-Dutch firm may have been down 2% y-o-y to US$5.3 billion, but that was still well ahead of even the highest analyst estimates of US$4.52 billion. Weaker refining margins and lower crude prices were cited as a slight drag on performance, but Shell’s acquisition of BG Group is paying dividends as strong natural gas performance contributed to the strong profits. Unlike ExxonMobil and Chevron, Shell has only dipped its toes in the Permian, preferring to maintain a strong global portfolio mixed between oil, gas and shale assets.
For the other European supermajors, BP and Total largely matched earning estimates. BP’s net profits of US$2.36 billion hit the target of analyst estimates. The addition of BHP Group’s US shale oil assets contributed to increased performance, while BP’s downstream performance was surprisingly resilient as its in-house supply and trading arm showed a strong performance – a business division that ExxonMobil lacks. France’s Total also hit the mark of expectations, with US$2.8 billion in net profit as lower crude prices offset the group’s record oil and gas output. Total’s upstream performance has been particularly notable – with start-ups in Angola, Brazil, the UK and Norway – with growth expected at 9% for the year.
All in all, the volatile environment over the first quarter of 2019 has seen some shift among the supermajors. Shell has eclipsed ExxonMobil once again – in both revenue and earnings – while Chevron’s failed bid for Anadarko won’t vault it up the rankings. Almost ten years after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP is now reclaiming its place after being overtaken by Total over the past few years. With Q219 looking to be quite volatile as well, brace yourselves for an interesting earnings season.
Supermajor Financials: Q1 2019
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, January, April, and May 2019 editions
In its May 2019 edition of the Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), EIA revised its price forecast for Brent crude oil upward, reflecting price increases in recent months, more recent data, and changing expectations of global oil markets. Several supply constraints have caused oil markets to be generally tighter and oil prices to be higher so far in 2019 than previous STEOs expected.
Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had agreed at a December 2018 meeting to cut crude oil production in the first six months of 2019; compliance with these cuts has been more effective than EIA initially expected. In the January STEO, OPEC’s crude oil and petroleum liquids production was expected to decline by 1.0 million b/d in 2019 compared with the 2018 level, but EIA now forecasts OPEC production to decline by 1.9 million b/d in the May STEO.
Within OPEC, EIA expects Iran’s liquid fuels production and exports to also decline. On April 22, 2019, the United States issued a statement indicating that it would not reissue waivers, which previously allowed eight countries to continue importing crude oil and condensate from Iran after their waivers expired on May 2. Although EIA’s previous forecasts had assumed that the United States would not reissue waivers, the increased certainty regarding waiver policy and enforcement led to lower forecasts of Iran’s crude oil production.
Venezuela—another OPEC member—has experienced declines in production and exports as a result of recurring power outages, political instability, and U.S. sanctions. In addition to supply constraints that have already materialized in 2019, political instability in Libya may further affect global supply. Any further escalation in conflict may damage crude oil infrastructure or result in a security environment where oil fields are shut in. Either situation could reduce global supply by more than EIA currently forecasts.
In the May STEO, total OPEC crude oil and other liquids supply was estimated at 37.3 million b/d in 2018, and EIA forecasts that it will average 35.4 million b/d in 2019. EIA assumes that the December 2018 agreement among OPEC members to limit production will expire following the June 2019 OPEC meeting.
U.S. crude oil and other liquids production is sensitive to changes in crude oil prices, taking into account a lag of several months for drilling operations to adjust. As crude oil prices have increased in recent months, so too have EIA’s domestic liquid fuels production forecasts for the remaining months of 2019.
U.S. crude oil and other liquids production, which grew by 2.2 million b/d in 2018, is forecast in EIA’s May STEO to grow by 2.0 million b/d in 2019, an increase of 310,000 b/d more than anticipated in the January STEO. In 2019, EIA expects overall U.S. crude oil and liquids production to average 19.9 million b/d, with crude oil production alone forecast to average 12.4 million b/d.
Relative to these changes in forecasted supply, EIA’s changes in forecasted demand were relatively minor. EIA expects that global oil markets will be tightest in the second and third quarters of 2019, resulting in draws in global inventories. By the fourth quarter of 2019, EIA expects that inventories will build again, and Brent crude oil prices will fall slightly.
More information about changes in STEO expectations for crude oil prices, supply, demand, and inventories is available in This Week in Petroleum.