NrgEdge Editor

Sharing content and articles for users
Last Updated: January 15, 2020
1 view
Business Trends
image

To operate well is to operate responsibly—but more must be done on sustainable design and balanced portfolios to achieve a net-zero future.

Hydrocarbons have powered economic growth for 150 years, but their emissions are destabilizing the earth’s climate. Now that the atmospheric impact of fossil fuels is widely recognized, the sector is under increasing pressure. Policy makers, investors, and society are pressing for change, threatening operators’ license to operate.

Operators have responded with strategic convening and conspicuous investments in innovation and diversification. Yet they have barely begun to address the 4.1 GtCO2e of emissions—almost 10 percent of all anthropogenic greenhouse gas—created every year by their own operations, two-thirds of it from upstream.

Technologies to decarbonize the extraction and production of hydrocarbons already exist and many are economically viable, yet the sector’s atmospheric emissions continue to rise. This paper explores why there has been little change so far, and shows how, with a bold vision and the determination to act, the oil and gas sector can step on a different path, an energy pathway that can contribute to limiting the rise in average global temperatures to 1.5°C.


Why so much greenhouse gas? A trio of emission-intensity drivers

Studying the emission intensity of upstream oil and gas assets reveals that three structural factors drive their “well to pipe” emission intensity.


First, resource complexity structurally sets an asset’s emission intensity

All else being equal, the least emission-intensive assets are large producers with high API gravity and low reservoir complexity. The data show that assets with API gravity of 20° or less can be, on average, three times more emission-intensive than those with API gravity of 50° or more. Assets with the highest structural emission intensity in our data set are complex reservoirs: viscous, in deep or ultra-deep water, compartmentalized, or high pressure and temperature. Pressure maintenance during primary production or secondary and tertiary recovery also increases energy and emission intensity. Simulations of GHG emissions from oil production show average emissions doubling over 25 years. In the IEA’s terminology, these are resources with intrinsically low energy return on energy invested (EROI).


Second, processes and engineering are crucial controllable drivers

Complex facilities are typically more energy-intensive, and therefore more emission-intensive. Hub platforms with more equipment and personnel require more energy for running core and auxiliary systems, while high manning levels intensify their logistics, which again increases emissions. A small single-steel-jacket platform is less emission-intensive than an FPSO with complex subsea export infrastructure connecting many complex wells.

Operations benchmarks—and our emission data—both show that the age of a production facility does not limit operational performance. However, older assets face more complex challenges in reducing emission intensity. Older equipment may be less efficient and economically challenging to replace. Aging production facilities may also suffer from higher fugitive emissions as wear parts degrade. On the other hand, process design choices can help offset the challenges of maturity.


Third, routine flaring and venting, if prevalent, can contribute 40 percent of the carbon intensity of hydrocarbon production in a region

In jurisdictions where venting and flaring are still common, such as Russia, Iran, the United States, Algeria, and Nigeria, oil facilities with high gas-to-oil ratios and few export or recovery options will routinely flare or vent the associated gas, emitting large volumes of CO2, some methane, and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). More widely, fugitive emissions and intermittent flaring and venting materially increase upstream methane emissions, which account for 34 percent of oil-production emissions and 41 percent of gas-production emissions, assuming 100-year global-warming potential. This waste is a problem, but its mitigation presents an economic opportunity.


So what is to be done? The path to decarbonization of upstream operations

In the short term, the structural drivers of emission intensity seem to limit the freedom upstream leaders have to reduce their atmospheric emissions. For producing assets, these constraints appear to be the hand they have been dealt. However, operators can choose how to play this hand, giving them more ways to reduce emission intensity than at first appear. Our operations benchmarks show that raising operational performance has a large impact on emissions. And 90 percent of known technological solutions to decarbonization are within the grasp of operators at a cost of no more than $50/metric ton of carbon.

We describe three levers to reduce emission intensity across the full spectrum of scope 1 (direct) and scope 2 (indirect) emissions from upstream oil and gas operations (Exhibit 1). The first, indisputable, step is optimizing operations—maximizing stability and uptime reduces intermittent flaring and venting, and requires few major process changes. Second, sustainable design choices are now available for deployment and increasingly present a positive economic benefit. Third, producers must start to balance their portfolios across resources with a spread of emission intensity in anticipation of the risks from future policy scenarios and investor choices.


Exhibit 1



The first decarbonization lever: Optimizing operations

Operating well equals operating responsibly. Above all, it is an economical first step in reducing intermittent flaring and venting and fugitive emissions, the third biggest source of emissions. Our analysis shows that across a global sample, once you correct for structural factors, assets in the top decile of production efficiency have the lowest emissions in the sector, based on the stability of their operations. The best can achieve less than 7 kg per barrel of oil equivalent, whereas assets in the third quartile emit at least three times as much.

To catch up, lower-performing assets must address three areas. First, resolve repeat failures that cause process trips or shutdowns. The flaring or venting of methane and other VOCs as equipment is depressurized for safe maintenance and restart leads to high emission intensity. Second, ensure operating parameters have not diverged significantly from the design envelope due to changes in fluid rates and properties. For example, pumps not running at their best efficiency point not only use more energy, but are also less reliable, both of which lead to higher emissions. Third, find and fix asset-integrity issues that increase fugitive emissions, such as degradation of flange joints, valve glands, or seals.

All three areas can be addressed within current operating models and are the core components of traditional levers to improve operational performance. We observe, on average, that a 10 percent increase in production efficiency delivers a 4 percent reduction in emission intensity, all else being constant. Maximizing stability and integrity may require upgrades of process, controls, and parts. A less capital-intensive route is to leverage data and advanced analytics to help optimize and stabilize operations. Predictive maintenance and automated condition-monitoring can reduce planned interventions and extend runs, improving stability and reducing emissions. Advanced analytics enables the next level of energy efficiency, isolating operating parameters that minimize power per unit throughput.


The second decarbonization lever: Sustainable design

There are multiple sustainable design options to make processes less emission-intensive. However, their use is not yet routine: traditional investment stage gates weight up-front capital costs over other considerations, such as energy efficiency or cost-to-operate. With total life-cycle value as the target function, operators may be more motivated to explore sustainable design. Doing so using proven technologies can not only reduce operating costs, but also generate new revenue streams.

Monetizing wasted gas. By some estimates, 257 bcm of natural gas—equivalent to nearly half the consumption of Europe—is wasted globally in flares, vents, and leaks. If monetized, this could generate nearly $40 billion of revenue globally. New ventures such as Capterio improve data transparency around flaring and install bespoke technological solutions that monetize the gas. Solutions include reinjecting to enhance recovery or disposal, power generation (for own use or grid export), building export routes to destination markets, or installing small-scale converters to create products such as CNG, LPG, GTL or LNG.

Reducing energy demand. Energy costs (including opportunity costs) are close to 15 percent of total production costs; recent work with upstream operators suggests they can save up to 20 percent in energy usage. This makes a compelling business case, with a total prize of up to $10 billion in cost reduction per year for the upstream industry. Modular unmanned installations around a supporting hub, as Norway is building in the NOAKA area, or better still, linked to a remote operations center, are gaining traction. Simpler, modular, and reusable facilities with low equipment counts and manning levels reduce costs and emissions from energy use and logistics.

Using zero-carbon energy supply. Sustainable sources of energy improve conversion efficiencies or generate revenue. Offshore grid-based electrification was first shown to be viable in 2003, when the Abu Safah development, 50 kilometers offshore in Saudi Arabia, started up with a connection to the main grid. More recently, the newly commissioned Johan Sverdrup is powered from shore even though it is 140 kilometers from Stavanger at a water depth of 110 to 120 meters. For more remote platforms, localized renewables generation offers a sustainable design option. Platforms in both the southern North Sea and Norwegian sectors, for instance, have introduced zero-carbon power sources with conventional backup for stand-alone facilities. To improve the economics of their deployment, operators might supply power to clusters of their own and third-party offshore facilities.

Removal through carbon capture, usage, and storage (CCU/S). CCU/S is an increasingly popular decarbonization option as seen in the Norwegian Continental Shelf with an encouraging example of CCU/S collaboration across the industry in the renewed Northern Lights project. When combined with CO2-enhanced recovery, it improves recovery rates in a closed-loop CO2 system and raises both production and emission performance.


The third decarbonization lever: Balanced portfolios

The demands of policy makers and investors are fast evolving. Credible scenarios show shareholders reducing their exposure to high-emitting resources, freezing out operators holding the highest-intensity assets. There are also credible scenarios in which policy and markets accelerate peak oil demand to 2025, thereby raising the cost of capital and making oil and gas unattractive as investments for growth.globall

Integrated oil company portfolios have tilted toward natural gas over the past few years, attracted by its reputation as a transition fuel. More recently, Equinor has announced the ambition to meet a carbon-intensity target of 8 kgCO2e/boe by 2030. Other producers have set emission-reduction targets at varying levels. Bold visions must recognize that the highest-emitting reservoirs are nearly three times more emission-intensive than the lowest-emitting ones. What follows is a set of choices for upstream leaders to make around their field-development plans, resource funnels, and portfolios.

Field-development plans need to weigh recovery factor against the emission performance of different production and pressure maintenance techniques. Likewise, building portfolios with better emission performance would involve high-grading only the lower-intensity resources or those for which sustainable design can fully offset the emission implications of resource complexity. Critical factors are viscosity, water depth, distance from shore, initial pressure, and depletion. If emission intensity were always a decision criterion, or a $50/metric ton carbon price were imputed in shaping resource funnels, investment committees would favor “advantaged” resources—those with higher API gravity, in shallow to medium water or requiring conventional production techniques. Or they might limit offshore investments closer to shore to enable grid-based electrification. The value equation, fortunately, boosts balanced portfolios: breakeven economics of many reservoirs with high emission intensity are marginal at more than $65.


How to make a strong start: The decarbonization fundamentals

Upstream leaders aspiring to reduce emissions must first overcome the uncertainties in understanding the emission performance of their assets and portfolios: what is really driving emissions, which emission sources to tackle urgently, and by how much. We respond to this baselining challenge by drawing on the McKinsey Upstream Energy & Emissions Index (MUEEI), a proprietary upstream energy and emission index of assets of different types and at different life stages. The index brings both consistency and detail, which enable operators to separate the controllable factors in emission intensity across the oil and gas life cycle from the external ones. The following sidebar explains the methodology, using a global sample of offshore assets, and illustrates how to apply the MUEEI in assessing current emission performance and in setting reduction targets.

Decarbonization oil gas upstream McKinsey hydrocarbon MUEEI
3
2 0

Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today

Latest NrgBuzz

Funko Action Figures: Collectible Figurines

Funko Action Figuresare a popular collectible toy that is now being incorporated into the workplace to motivate employees. The action figures have been used as an alternative to the traditional desk calendar or as a prize for top performers. With this type of incentive, employers can expect their employees to feel more motivated and productive.


Many employers have found that Funko Action Figures are a great way to motivate their employees and provide incentives for high performance at work. Funko Action Figures are a popular collectible toy that is now incorporated into the workplace. These small collectibles are given to employees to motivate them. Funko figures were once only available at comic book stores, but now they are being used in offices for this purpose.


The company is called Zappos and they first introduced this idea back in 2009. They gave these figurines to their employees as a way of motivating and rewarding them for their hard work and dedication. Although it’s not very clear why the action figures themselves motivate people, we can see that it has been working well for Zappos as they have continued to use it since 2009. These soft-bodied vinyl figures, often called "Pop!" Figures were originally conceived by Mike Becker and founded by Alan Becker.


The Funko Pop! Action Figure is a line of collectible toys produced by the company Funko LLC. They are typically stylized vinyl figures depicting characters from various media and entertainment. First introduced to the public in 2005, the company was originally founded as a bobblehead company in 1998 and became popular through distribution at chain retailers such as Walmart and Target. The first wave of Funko Pops was based on Disney properties like Mickey Mouse as well as other popular culture icons such as Conan O’Brien and Catwoman.


Funko Action Figures are collectible figurines that often depict pop culture characters. They are often used in the office to motivate employees and provide a sense of community. Funko has established itself as a major player in the toy industry with its trademarked Pop! vinyl figures. This company is taking on new ventures like collecting by introducing Funko Action Figures, for example, Boba Fett from the Star Wars movies. This type of product is sometimes called a 'blind box' because you don't know which figure you're getting until you open it. The Boston-based company, BuzzFeed, has introduced this type of toy into their office to help with team building and morale. The employees at this company seem to have a lot of fun with them.


May, 25 2022
Asset Works - Fleet Management Software

Asset Works FleetFocus fleet management software is a powerful solution designed to help asset- and infrastructure-intensive organizations control costs and streamline operations. By tracking vehicle location and maintenance history, fleet managers can extend the useful life of their fleet and prevent costly downtime. With preventive maintenance scheduling, work order and labor tracking, and parts and inventory tracking, FleetFocus helps fleet managers maximize efficiency while minimizing expenses. As a result, Asset Works fleet management solutions deliver industry-leading value for fleet managers around the world.

Support: [email protected]


May, 24 2022
Where to buy your Gun Parts from?

It is important to know where to gun parts from. There are many places you can buy them from, but it is important to choose the right place so that you get the best quality and service. There are many places where you can buy gun parts from. You can buy them from gun stores, online retailers, and even at a flea market.



One of the best places to buy gun parts from is Always Armed.They have a wide range of products available, they offer great customer service, and they have convenient shipping options.



Buying gun parts can be a difficult task. There are many different types of firearms and there is a huge variety of gun parts. The right place to buy gun parts depends on what you are looking for and what kind of firearm you have.



If you are looking for a specific part, then your best bet is to search online. You can find the part that you need at an affordable price and it will be delivered right to your door. If you want to save time, then this is the best option for you. If not, then your local gun store might be the best option for you because they have many different types of firearms as well as all kinds of other equipment that might come in handy for hunting or shooting sports.



When it comes to buying gun parts, you need to be very careful. There are a lot of scams out there and some companies just want to take your money and never send you the goods. 

May, 20 2022