NrgEdge Editor

Sharing content and articles for users
Last Updated: June 26, 2020
1 view
Business Trends
image

Overview 

  • Nigeria is the largest oil producer in Africa. It holds the largest natural gas reserves on the continent and was the world’s fifth–largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2018.[1] Although Nigeria is the leading crude oil producer in Africa, production is affected by sporadic supply disruptions.
  • Nigeria’s crude oil and natural gas resources are the mainstay of the country’s economy. Because Nigeria heavily depends on oil revenue, its economy is noticeably affected by crude oil price changes. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects that Nigeria’s crude oil and natural gas exports earned $55 billion in 2018, which is $23 billion higher than in 2016.[2] The growth in export revenue, which can be partly attributed to the rebound in crude oil prices, has helped improve Nigeria’s fiscal position. However, Nigeria’s fiscal deficit remained flat at 4% of its gross domestic product (GDP) because of a significant increase in capital expenditures and lower–than–expected non–oil revenue collection, in spite of improvements to the country’s tax administration. The Nigerian government still heavily relies on crude oil and natural gas revenue; its non–oil revenue comprises only 3.4% of GDP, one of the lowest in the world.[3]


Sector organization

Recent updates

  • In September 2018, President Muhammadu Buhari vetoed the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) that was passed by the legislature in March 2018, which delayed efforts to liberalize the oil and natural gas sector and restructure the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). The PIGB is one of four separate bills that were taken from the previous version, the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB). Latest reports indicate that the National Assembly is drafting a new version of the PIB and is hoping to pass the bill by the end of 2020, although when or if this action will occur is unclear.[4]
  • The Nigerian government passed the Finance Act 2020 in January 2020. This act amends a number of tax laws and is aimed at improving tax participation and collection and modernizing the tax system. Provisions in the bill, such as the Petroleum Profits Tax (which repeals a tax exemption for dividends paid from after–tax profits), a value–added tax (which increases from 5% to 7.5%), and the Companies Income Tax (which requires Nigerian companies to deduct and withhold tax on payments to any foreign company that provides them with technical or professional services), are likely to affect oil and natural gas companies and increase their overall cost of doing business in the country.[5]
  • The Finance 2020 Act follows a November 2019 amendment to the 1999 Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Production Sharing Contracts Act, which changed royalty rates for deepwater (specifically greater than 200 meters in water depth) and inland basin contracts (which comprise onshore basins aside from the Niger Delta) to 10% and 7.5%, respectively. The amendment also introduces an additional royalty tax rate that ranges from 0% to 10% based on the price of crude oil. Given that international oil companies (IOCs) primarily operate in the deepwater fields in Nigeria, this amendment is likely to increase government’s share of revenue generated from these fields and to lead investors to re–evaluate their investment plans for currently producing fields as well as new–source development.[6]


Petroleum and other liquids

Exploration and production

  • According to the Oil & Gas Journal, Nigeria had an estimated 37.0 billion barrels of proved crude oil reserves by the end of 2019–the second–largest amount in Africa after Libya.[7] The majority of reserves are along the country’s Niger River Delta and offshore in the Bight of Benin, the Gulf of Guinea, and the Bight of Bonny.
  • As a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Nigeria renewed its commitment to reduce crude oil production in April 2020, capping its production at 1.41 million barrels per day (b/d).[8] The agreement takes effect on May 1, 2020, and ends on April 30, 2022.[9] However, Nigeria’s compliance with the OPEC+ agreement has been intermittent; the country has at times produced more than the agreed-upon quota in the past. In addition, Nigeria has designated some of its crude oil streams as lease condensate, which is not subject to the OPEC+ agreement production cuts, which allows Nigeria to circumvent its obligation to reduce production.
  • In 2019, Nigeria produced about 2.0 million b/d of petroleum and other liquids, of which 1.65 million b/d was crude oil. The remainder is composed of natural gas plant liquids, other liquids, and refinery processing gains[10] (Figure 1).
  • The deepwater Egina project was the latest significant field to come online in Nigeria. The Egina field came online in January 2019 and reached its peak production plateau of 200,000 b/d at the end of 2019. The Nigerian minister of petroleum, Emmanuel Kachikwu, has labeled Egina crude oil as a condensate, in spite of its API gravity and sulfur content being specified at 27° and 0.17%, respectively, a crude oil assay that would place it in the medium, sweet categories.[11]
  • Smaller fields, such as the offshore Gbetiokun field and the onshore Qua Ibo field in the eastern part of the Niger Delta, have provided marginal increases to Nigeria’s crude oil production in the past year.[12] These projects have helped to partially offset production declines at Nigeria’s older, more mature fields. Other planned deepwater projects have been repeatedly delayed because of regulatory uncertainty surrounding the PIB. In addition, the recent deepwater royalty tax increase may further inhibit investor interest in exploration and development of new offshore fields.
  • Exploration activities have largely focused in deepwater and ultra-deepwater offshore fields, partially as a result of security concerns onshore, and many IOCs have divested their onshore assets. The NNPC plans to launch a new crude oil licensing round in mid–2020, although the licensing round will likely be postponed until after the PIB legislation issue is resolved later this year. Whether or not there will be sufficient investor interest if the PIB does not pass is unclear, given the recent amendments to the royalty tax structure for deepwater production.[13]


Refining and refined oil products

  • Nigeria relies on imports of petroleum products to meet domestic demand, importing about 442,000 b/d of petroleum products in 2018.[14]
  • The country has three major crude oil refineries (Port Harcourt I and II, Warri, and Kaduna) and has a total crude oil distillation capacity of 423,750 b/d, according to the Oil & Gas Journal.[15] All three refineries are run by the state–owned national oil company (NOC), NNPC. These refineries persistently operate at far lower than full capacity because of operational failures, fires, and sabotage, mainly on the crude oil pipelines feeding the refineries. NNPC has begun rehabilitation work at its refineries, and the NNPC’s latest reports indicate that the refineries have been shuttered. The rehabilitation work is expected to be completed by 2022, although how much throughput the refineries will have after rehabilitation is unclear. NNPC stated in April 2020 that it will no longer run the refineries after rehabilitation and is reportedly seeking a private sector company to manage operations at the refineries.[16]
  • A small, privately owned refinery located in Ogbele, Ahoada, in the Rivers state expanded its refining capacity to 6,000 b/d in January 2020. The expansions completed at the refinery will allow it to produce and market other fuels such as heavy residual fuel oil, marine diesel, and kerosene. Previously, diesel was the only petroleum product the refinery could produce. The refinery is owned by Niger Delta Petroleum Resources (NPDR), a subsidiary of Niger Delta Exploration and Production; NPDR plans to further increase the refinery’s capacity to 11,000 b/d in the future, although they have not released any concrete dates.[17]
  • Nigeria has a gas–to–liquids (GTL) plant at Escravos with a nameplate capacity of 33,000 b/d that started production in mid–2014, about a decade behind schedule. The Escravos GTL plant is operated by Chevron (75%) in partnership with NNPC (25%). The Escravos GTL plant can convert about 475 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of natural gas into diesel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and naphtha products, primarily for export.[18]
  • The Dangote Group, a Nigerian conglomerate, is constructing an integrated refining and petrochemical complex in the Lekki Free Trade Zone east of Lagos, Nigeria’s most populous city. The Dangote Group expects the refinery to come online by 2021, although the refinery is not likely to be completed on time.[19] According to the Oil & Gas Journal, the refining and petrochemical complex will have a 650,000 b/d crude oil distillation unit (making it the world’s largest single–train refinery), a 3.6 million ton per year polypropylene plant, a 3.0 million ton per year urea plant, and natural gas processing installations to feed in natural gas.[20] Once completed, it will be the largest refinery in Africa and is expected to significantly affect domestic and regional crude oil and petroleum products markets.


Petroleum and other liquids

According to the latest estimates by Global Trade Tracker, Nigeria exported about 2.08 million b/d of crude oil and condensate in 2019. India was the largest importer of Nigeria’s crude oil and condensate, purchasing about 420,000 b/d in 2019. Spain and the Netherlands were the next largest importers of Nigeria’s crude oil and condensate, each importing about 238,000 and 208,000 b/d in 2019, respectively. The United States was the fourth–largest importing country of Nigeria’s crude oil and condensate in 2019. Europe continued to be the largest importer by region, importing nearly 1 million b/d[21] (Figure 2).


Natural gasExploration and production


  • Nigeria had an estimated 200.4 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of proved natural gas reserves by the end of 2019, according to the Oil & Gas Journal. Nigeria has the largest natural gas reserves in Africa.[22]
  • According to the latest estimates by EIA, Nigeria produced 1.6 Tcf of dry natural gas (or marketed natural gas production) in 2019.[23] Nigeria’s natural gas industry is also affected by the same security and regulatory issues that affect the crude oil industry.
  • A significant amount of Nigeria’s gross natural gas production is either re–injected or flared. Some of Nigeria’s oil fields lack the infrastructure to capture the natural gas produced with oil, known as associated gas. According to the most recent data by the World Bank’s Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR), Nigeria flared about 261 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas in 2018, making Nigeria the seventh–largest natural gas flaring country in terms of annual natural gas flaring volume.[24]
  • In December 2019, Nigeria LNG (NLNG) reached financial close, or its final investment decision, to add a seventh train to its existing facility, adding about 365 Bcf, thus increasing the total capacity of the facility to 1.4 Tcf. The expansion project was initially proposed in 2005 but encountered numerous delays. NLNG expects the project to be completed by 2024, and it will be operated by Shell (25.6%), and the other shareholders are NNPC (49%), Total (15%), and Eni (10.4%)[25] (Figure 3).


Natural gas exports
  • Nigeria exports natural gas primarily as LNG. Both infrastructure and demand constraints are challenges to exporting primarily by pipeline to neighboring countries. Nigeria began exporting LNG in 1999 when the first two trains at the Bonny Island facility were completed.[26]
  • According to the latest estimates in BP’s 2019 Statistical Review of World Energy, Nigeria exported about 982 Bcf of LNG in 2018, ranking Nigeria as the world’s fifth–largest LNG exporter, behind Qatar, Australia, Malaysia, and the United States. Nigeria’s LNG exports accounted for about 6.5% of LNG traded globally. Spain was the largest importer of Nigeria’s LNG in 2018, importing about 146 Bcf of Nigeria’s LNG, followed by India (143 Bcf), and France (126 Bcf)[27] (Figure 4).


Energy consumption
  • According to EIA’s latest estimates, total primary energy consumption in Nigeria was about 1.5 quadrillion British thermal units in 2017. Most primary energy consumption in the country was derived from natural gas, petroleum, and other liquids (97%). Traditional biomass and waste (typically consisting of wood, charcoal, manure, and crop residues used for power generation), coal, and renewables accounted for only a marginal amount of consumption (3%) in 2017.[28]


Electricity
  • Nigeria’s generation capacity was 12,664 megawatts (MW) in 2017, of which 10,522 MW (83%) was from fossil fuels; 2,110 MW (17%) was from hydroelectricity; and 32 MW (1%) was from solar, wind, and biomass and waste. Net electricity generation was far lower than capacity and was 30.6 billion kilowatthours (3,495 MW) in 2017, or about 28% of total capacity.[29]
  • Although Nigeria is the continent’s largest economy, only 60% of the population had access to electricity in 2018, according to the latest estimates by the International Energy Agency. Most of Nigeria’s fossil fuel–derived electricity generation is from natural gas, and crude oil is mainly used for backup power generation. Nigeria’s power sector suffers from poor maintenance of electricity facilities, natural gas supply shortages, and an inadequate transmission and distribution network.[30]


Renewable Energy Sources
  • Nigeria has set ambitious goals to increase renewable power generation capacity. The Nigerian government has approved the contract to develop the 3.01 GW Mambilla hydropower plant located in the Taraba state. The Exim Bank of China will provide 85% of the required financing to develop the project, and the contract to construct the facility was awarded in November 2017 to a consortium of three Chinese companies, including the Gezhouba Group.[31] Other significant hydropower projects that are currently in development or construction include the 700 MW Zungeru hydropower project and the 40 MW Kashimbila hydropower project, which are currently under construction, and the rehabilitation of the 578 MW Jebba hydropower project and the 548 MW Kainji hydropower project. These projects are reportedly due to come online in the next two to three years, but whether the completion dates will be postponed because of project delays is still unclear.[32]
  • Government support and investor interest in solar power projects have been growing in the past few years in Nigeria, partially as a way to mitigate natural gas supply shortages and to increase access to electricity in remote and rural areas. The Nigerian government, the Rural Electrification Agency, and the World Bank–funded Nigeria Electrification Project are jointly funding a $75 million grant to encourage off–grid solar investments to reduce kerosene and diesel use for lighting and backup power generation.[33] In July 2016, Nigeria signed power purchase agreements with 14 utility–scale solar photovoltaic facilities that have a total generation capacity of 1.1 GW, although none of these projects has yet reached financial close, and reportedly the independent power producers and the Nigerian government have a dispute regarding tariff pricing.[34]

renewable energy electricity energy consumption natural gas exports imports exploration production petroleum Nigeria refined oil products oil EIA
3
2 0

Something interesting to share?
Join NrgEdge and create your own NrgBuzz today

Latest NrgBuzz

Libya & OPEC’s Quota

The constant domestic fighting in Libya – a civil war, to call a spade a spade, has taken a toll on the once-prolific oil production in the North African country. After nearly a decade of turmoil, it appears now that the violent clash between the UN-recognised government in Tripoli and the upstart insurgent Libyan National Army (LNA) forces could be ameliorating into something less destructive with the announcement of a pact between the two sides that would to some normalisation of oil production and exports.

A quick recap. Since the 2011 uprising that ended the rule of dictator Muammar Gaddafi, Libya has been in a state of perpetual turmoil. Led by General Khalifa Haftar and the remnants of loyalists that fought under Gaddafi’s full-green flag, the Libyan National Army stands in direct opposition to the UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA) that was formed in 2015. Caught between the two sides are the Libyan people and Libya’s oilfields. Access to key oilfields and key port facilities has changed hands constantly over the past few years, resulting in a start-stop rhythm that has sapped productivity and, more than once, forced Libya’s National Oil Corporation (NOC) to issue force majeure on its exports. Libya’s largest producing field, El Sharara, has had to stop production because of Haftar’s militia aggression no fewer than four times in the past four years. At one point, all seven of Libya’s oil ports – including Zawiyah (350 kb/d), Es Sider (360 kb/d) and Ras Lanuf (230 kb/d) were blockaded as pipelines ran dry. For a country that used to produce an average of 1.2 mmb/d of crude oil, currently output stands at only 80,000 b/d and exports considerably less. Gaddafi might have been an abhorrent strongman, but political stability can have its pros.

This mutually-destructive impasse, economically, at least might be lifted, at least partially, if the GNA and LNA follow through with their agreement to let Libyan oil flow again. The deal, brokered in Moscow between the warlord Haftar and Vice President of the Libyan Presidential Council Ahmed Maiteeq calls for the ‘unrestrained’ resumption of crude oil production that has been at a near standstill since January 2020. The caveat because there always is one, is that Haftar demanded that oil revenues be ‘distributed fairly’ in order to lift the blockade he has initiated across most of the country’s upstream infrastructure.

Shortly after the announcement of the deal, the NOC announced that it would kick off restarting oil production and exports, lifting an 8-month force majeure situation, but only at ‘secure terminals and facilities’. ‘Secure’ in this cases means facilities and fields where NOC has full control, but will exclude areas and assets that the LNA rebels still have control. That’s a significant limitation, since the LNA, which includes support from local tribal groups and Russian mercenaries still controls key oilfields and terminals. But it is also a softening from the NOC, which had previously stated that it would only return to operations when all rebels had left all facilities, citing safety of its staff.

If the deal moves forward, it would certainly be an improvement to the major economic crisis faced by Libya, where cash flow has dried up and basic utilities face severe cutbacks. But it is still an ‘if’. Many within the GNA sphere are critical of the deal struck by Maiteeq, claiming that it did not involve the consultation or input of his allies. The current GNA leader, Prime Minister Fayyaz al Sarraj is also stepping down at the end of October, ushering in another political sea change that could affect the deal. Haftar is a mercurial beast, so predictions are difficult, but what is certain is that depriving a country of its chief moneymaker is a recipe for disaster on all sides. Which is why the deal will probably go ahead.

Which is bad news for the OPEC+ club. Because of its precarious situation, Libya has been exempt for the current OPEC+ supply deal. Even the best case scenarios within OPEC+ had factored out Libya, given the severe uncertainty of the situation there. But if the deal goes through and holds, it could potentially add a significant amount of restored crude supply to global markets at a time when OPEC+ itself is struggling to manage the quotas within its own, from recalcitrant members like Iraq to surprising flouters like the UAE.

Mathematically at least, the ceiling for restored Libyan production is likely in the 300-400,000 b/d range, given that Haftar is still in control of the main fields and ports. That does not seem like much, but it will give cause for dissent within OPEC on the exemption of Libya from the supply deal. Libya will resist being roped into the supply deal, and it has justification to do so. But freeing those Libyan volumes into a world market that is already suffering from oversupply and weak prices will be undermining in nature. The equation has changed, and the Libyan situation can no longer be taken for granted.

Market Outlook:

  •  Crude price trading range: Brent – US$41-43/b, WTI – US$39-41/b
  • While a resurgence in Covid-19 cases globally is undermining faith that the ongoing oil demand recovery will continue unabated, crude markets have been buoyed by a show of force by Saudi Arabia and US supply disruptions from Tropical Storm Sally
  • In a week when Iraq’s OPEC+ commitments seem even more distant with signs of its crude exports rising and key Saudi ally the UAE admitting it had ‘pumped too much recently’, the Saudi Energy Minister issued a force condemnation on breaking quotas
  • On the demand side, the IEA revised its forecast for oil demand in 2020 to an annual decline of 8.4 mmb/d, up from 8.1 mmb/d in August, citing Covid resurgences
  • In a possible preview of the future, BP issued a report stating that the ‘relentless growth of oil demand is over’, offering its own vision of future energy requirements that splits the oil world into the pro-clean lobby led by Europeans and the prevailing oil/gas orthodoxy that remains in place across North America and the rest of the world

END OF ARTICLE

Get timely updates about latest developments in oil & gas delivered to your inbox. Join our email list and get your targeted content regularly for free.

Click here to join.

No alt text provided for this image

Find more details here. Looking for other courses? Click here

September, 22 2020
Average U.S. construction costs for solar and wind generation continue to fall

According to 2018 data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for newly constructed utility-scale electric generators in the United States, annual capacity-weighted average construction costs for solar photovoltaic systems and onshore wind turbines have continued to decrease. Natural gas generator costs also decreased slightly in 2018.

From 2013 to 2018, costs for solar fell 50%, costs for wind fell 27%, and costs for natural gas fell 13%. Together, these three generation technologies accounted for more than 98% of total capacity added to the electricity grid in the United States in 2018. Investment in U.S. electric-generating capacity in 2018 increased by 9.3% from 2017, driven by natural gas capacity additions.

Solar
The average construction cost for solar photovoltaic generators is higher than wind and natural gas generators on a dollar-per-kilowatt basis, although the gap is narrowing as the cost of solar falls rapidly. From 2017 to 2018, the average construction cost of solar in the United States fell 21% to $1,848 per kilowatt (kW). The decrease was driven by falling costs for crystalline silicon fixed-tilt panels, which were at their lowest average construction cost of $1,767 per kW in 2018.

Crystalline silicon fixed-tilt panels—which accounted for more than one-third of the solar capacity added in the United States in 2018, at 1.7 gigawatts (GW)—had the second-highest share of solar capacity additions by technology. Crystalline silicon axis-based tracking panels had the highest share, with 2.0 GW (41% of total solar capacity additions) of added generating capacity at an average cost of $1,834 per kW.

average construction costs for solar photovoltaic electricity generators

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

Wind
Total U.S. wind capacity additions increased 18% from 2017 to 2018 as the average construction cost for wind turbines dropped 16% to $1,382 per kW. All wind farm size classes had lower average construction costs in 2018. The largest decreases were at wind farms with 1 megawatt (MW) to 25 MW of capacity; construction costs at these farms decreased by 22.6% to $1,790 per kW.

average construction costs for wind farms

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

Natural gas
Compared with other generation technologies, natural gas technologies received the highest U.S. investment in 2018, accounting for 46% of total capacity additions for all energy sources. Growth in natural gas electric-generating capacity was led by significant additions in new capacity from combined-cycle facilities, which almost doubled the previous year’s additions for that technology. Combined-cycle technology construction costs dropped by 4% in 2018 to $858 per kW.

average construction costs for natural gas-fired electricity generators

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generator Construction Costs and Annual Electric Generator Inventory

September, 17 2020
Fossil fuels account for the largest share of U.S. energy production and consumption

Fossil fuels, or energy sources formed in the Earth’s crust from decayed organic material, including petroleum, natural gas, and coal, continue to account for the largest share of energy production and consumption in the United States. In 2019, 80% of domestic energy production was from fossil fuels, and 80% of domestic energy consumption originated from fossil fuels.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes the U.S. total energy flow diagram to visualize U.S. energy from primary energy supply (production and imports) to disposition (consumption, exports, and net stock additions). In this diagram, losses that take place when primary energy sources are converted into electricity are allocated proportionally to the end-use sectors. The result is a visualization that associates the primary energy consumed to generate electricity with the end-use sectors of the retail electricity sales customers, even though the amount of electric energy end users directly consumed was significantly less.

U.S. primary energy production by source

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

The share of U.S. total energy production from fossil fuels peaked in 1966 at 93%. Total fossil fuel production has continued to rise, but production has also risen for non-fossil fuel sources such as nuclear power and renewables. As a result, fossil fuels have accounted for about 80% of U.S. energy production in the past decade.

Since 2008, U.S. production of crude oil, dry natural gas, and natural gas plant liquids (NGPL) has increased by 15 quadrillion British thermal units (quads), 14 quads, and 4 quads, respectively. These increases have more than offset decreasing coal production, which has fallen 10 quads since its peak in 2008.

U.S. primary energy overview and net imports share of consumption

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

In 2019, U.S. energy production exceeded energy consumption for the first time since 1957, and U.S. energy exports exceeded energy imports for the first time since 1952. U.S. energy net imports as a share of consumption peaked in 2005 at 30%. Although energy net imports fell below zero in 2019, many regions of the United States still import significant amounts of energy.

Most U.S. energy trade is from petroleum (crude oil and petroleum products), which accounted for 69% of energy exports and 86% of energy imports in 2019. Much of the imported crude oil is processed by U.S. refineries and is then exported as petroleum products. Petroleum products accounted for 42% of total U.S. energy exports in 2019.

U.S. primary energy consumption by source

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

The share of U.S. total energy consumption that originated from fossil fuels has fallen from its peak of 94% in 1966 to 80% in 2019. The total amount of fossil fuels consumed in the United States has also fallen from its peak of 86 quads in 2007. Since then, coal consumption has decreased by 11 quads. In 2019, renewable energy consumption in the United States surpassed coal consumption for the first time. The decrease in coal consumption, along with a 3-quad decrease in petroleum consumption, more than offset an 8-quad increase in natural gas consumption.

EIA previously published articles explaining the energy flows of petroleum, natural gas, coal, and electricity. More information about total energy consumption, production, trade, and emissions is available in EIA’s Monthly Energy Review.

Principal contributor: Bill Sanchez

September, 15 2020